You are here

Court Administration

Displaying 11 - 20 of 94, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2025
Greater than or equal to
Irene M. Keeley
December 3, 2020

Judge Irene M. Keeley (N.D. W. Va.) introduces this series, designed to provide judges with a basic understanding of opioid use and its effect on the federal courts, and outlines the objective: to equip judges with a series of takeaways they can readily apply in their respective courts.

Irene M. Keeley
December 3, 2020

In concluding remarks, Judge Irene Keeley (N.D. W.

Joseph LaFratta, Mary Page Kelley, Jason A. Cantone
December 3, 2020

Chief Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley (D. Mass.) and Deputy Chief Probation Officer Joseph LaFratta (D. Mass.) discuss the structure, commitment required, and lessons learned from their court’s experience with a successful drug treatment court program. 

 

Ricardo S. Martinez
December 3, 2020

In this module, Chief Judge Ricardo Martinez (W.D. Wash.) relates lessons from his extensive experience running drug court programs in both state and federal courts.

April 9, 2020

** Please note that the number of copies is limited and we're unable to fulfill bulk requests of more than 25 copies for training purposes.

Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Lawrence A. Larose
December 10, 2018

When municipalities declare bankruptcy, the fate of public employees’ pensions and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) are almost always one of the most contentious issues that need to be settled.

September 12, 2018

This guide provides information for judges about organizing, managing, and storing physical documents and electronic materials in chambers. It discusses the importance of federal judges' papers as a documentary record of judges' careers and the work of the federal courts.

February 17, 2017

This handbook provides an overview of chambers operations and the work of the federal courts.

§ 2.2 of the handbook was revised in December 2017 to include clarifying language regarding workplace harassment (see printable insert pages below).

February 13, 2015

A well-designed and carefully administered judicial performance evaluation (JPE) program can serve to improve the administration of justice and enhance public confidence in the judiciary.

Pages

Subscribe to Court Administration