You are here

Case Management

Displaying 1251 - 1260 of 1399, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Thomas E. Willging
June 7, 1984

Asbestos Case Management Orders.

Nancy A. Weeks
April 1, 1984

Research on the local impacts of Federal Civil Rule 16(b)

Nancy A. Weeks
January 1, 1984

An examination of the local rules federal district courts have developed in response to the 1983 amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, which calls for increased use of scheduling orders in managing caseloads. An appendix contains sample local rules from fifteen districts.

Russell R. Wheeler
January 1, 1984

A detailed reference for chief judges of federal district courts, the Desk Book describes their general position within the system of federal judicial administration as well as their specific roles and responsibilities with respect to national and regional bodies of judicial administration; other

Barbara Meierhoefer
January 1, 1984

A description of some of the orientation methods that have been used by various district courts to introduce new judges to judicial tasks and local court practice. An appendix includes an orientation checklist developed by the Center.

Arthur R. Miller
January 1, 1984

An informal discussion, adapted from a lecture at a Center workshop, of the amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7, 11, 16, and 26.

John E. Shapard
January 1, 1984

An investigation of problems encountered by the Ninth Circuit in its Appeals Without Briefs (AWB) Program, which was designed to expedite the disposition of civil appeals presenting comparatively straightforward issues.

Allan E. Lind, John E. Shapard
January 1, 1983

An early evaluation of the effectiveness of local rules that provided for mandatory, nonbinding arbitration in three federal district courts.

Joe S. Cecil, Barbara Meierhoefer
January 1, 1983

A description of a rule adopted by the Eastern District of Michigan that permits a judge to refer diversity cases to a mediation panel and to impose certain costs as a penalty if a resulting trial does not improve on the award suggested by the panel.

Pages

Subscribe to Case Management