You are here

Research Reports

Displaying 241 - 250 of 335, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Charles W. Nihan, Russell R. Wheeler
January 1, 1982

A description of how chief judges of the federal appellate courts discharged their administrative responsibilities in the early 1980s, based on interviews with chief judges, circuit executives, and other court personnel.

Carl M. Moore, M. Daniel Jacoubovitch
January 1, 1982

An early analysis of the summary jury trial (SJT) procedure and a documentation of the views and concerns of participants in summary jury trials.

James B. Eaglin, Patricia A. Lombard
January 1, 1982

An evaluation of the comparative validity of four risk prediction scales used for classifying federal probation caseloads. The authors found the U.S.D.C. 75 Scale to have the best balance of validity and predictive power, and they recommend that it be used by all U.S. probation officers.

Judicial Conference of the United States, Committee on the Operation of the Jury System
January 1, 1982

These instructions were prepared initially by a Federal Judicial Center committee in 1982 and revised in 1987 by the former Subcommittee on Pattern Jury Instructions of the former Judicial Conference Committee on the Operation of the Jury System.

Michael W. Leavitt
September 18, 1981

-

Anthony Partridge, Alan J. Chaset, William B. Eldridge
January 1, 1981

A description of the statutory sentencing alternatives in the federal courts.

J. Michael Greenwood
January 1, 1981

A survey of the experiences of official federal court reporters using computer-aided transcription (CAT) technologies. The study reports mixed evaluations of the relative costs and benefits of CAT.

Alan J. Chaset
January 1, 1981

An analysis of statutory procedures proposed in the early 1980s, and which continue to arise, that would allow federal litigants to challenge, on a peremptory basis, the federal judge or magistrate judge assigned to their case.

Carl Baar
January 1, 1981

An early review of various procedures used by state legislatures and judiciaries to create judgeships. In light of those procedures, the author analyzes the federal judgeship creation process and suggests alternatives to it.

Philip L. Dubois
January 1, 1981

An early comparative analysis of management styles in the fifteen metropolitan district courts. The report is based on personal interviews with chief judges, clerks of court, and other judges and circuit personnel.

Pages

Subscribe to Research Reports