You are here

Research Reports

Displaying 181 - 190 of 337, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Jeffrey N. Barr, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1994

A report prepared for the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal under the title: Administration of the Federal Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980: Final Report.

Carol L. Krafka, David E. Rauma
January 1, 1994

A statutorily mandated report on the pilot court-annexed voluntary arbitration programs in eight federal district courts. The study examines program use in the context of the programs' referral systems.

January 1, 1994

Results from the Center's 1992 survey of nearly all federal judges on a wide range of issues of concern to the federal courts.

Carol L. Krafka, Molly Johnson
January 1, 1994

An evaluation of the Judicial Conference's 1991-1993 pilot program allowing electronic media coverage of federal civil proceedings in six district and two appellate courts.

Carol L. Krafka, Patricia A. Lombard, Donna J. Stienstra, Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Carol Witcher
September 1, 1993

A "how-to" manual based on the experience of the Research Division staff to help in anticipating the steps involved and to plan for the resources necessary to successfully get information by mail questionnaire.

Robert W. Kastenmeier
August 2, 1993

In 1990, Congress created the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal, who's charge included investigation of problems related to the discipline and removal of life-tenured federal judges, and evaluation of alternatives to current arrangements for judicial discipline and removal, i

Emily Field Van Tassel, Beverly Hudson Wirtz, Peter A. Wonders
January 1, 1993

Provides a historical perspective on the reasons federal judges have left the bench. The study focuses on the fewer than 200 judges who, over the last 200 years, resigned from the bench for stated reasons other than age or health.

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1993

A study of why judges rarely appoint experts under Rule 706. In discussing this issue with judges, the authors learned of techniques and procedures that may aid judges when considering whether to appoint an expert or when managing an expert who has been appointed.

Judith A. McKenna
January 1, 1993

A study requested by the Federal Courts Study Committee Implementation Act of 1990 of the problems facing the federal courts of appeals and the numerous changes, structural and otherwise, that have been suggested as solutions.

Joe S. Cecil, Thomas E. Willging, Emily Z. Huebner
August 1, 1992

A magazine that reported Center research and education activities in a concise format. In this issue of FJC Directions:

Pages

Subscribe to Research Reports