Capital Habeas

Displaying 1 - 10 of 62, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Margaret S. Williams, Barbara Meierhoefer

February 6, 2020

In late 2017, the Committee on Defender Services (Committee) asked the Federal Judicial Center to generate a white paper on the potential effects on the federal courts and the defender services program of a determination that states have “opted in” to special expedited procedures created by the A

Capital § 2254 Habeas Cases: A Pocket Guide for Judges

Kristine Fox

January 1, 2012

This pocket guide provides a basic overview of the issues judges can expect to face when assigned a capital habeas case. It begins with appointment of counsel, budgeting concerns, and stays of execution.

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

March 1, 2010

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Capital Habeas

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Capital § 2254 Habeas Cases: A Pocket Guide for Judges

Appendix B-6: Northern District of Texas — Order Appointing Counsel

Appendix G-3: Southern District of Ohio — Order for Status Reports

Appendix F-4: District of Nevada — Scheduling Order

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

Appendix F-5: Western District of Oklahoma — Scheduling Order

Appendix E-1: Middle District of Alabama — General Procedure Order

Appendix C-3: Middle District of Alabama — Order Providing Format for Proposed Litigation Budget

Appendix G-2: Southern District of Ohio — Order Staying Case Pending State Court Proceedings

Pages