You are here

Sentencing

Displaying 61 - 70 of 70, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Anthony Partridge, Michael W. Leavitt
January 1, 1979

A critical analysis of particular research into federal criminal sentencing activity. The authors indicate methodological error in prior work on sentencing guidelines and suggest alternative approaches.

Stephen J. Schulhofer
January 1, 1979

A discussion of specific ways in which prosecutorial influence over sentences might be affected by sentencing guideline systems debated in Congress. The first volume contains the body of the report, with analyses and conclusions; the second is a technical supplement.

Anthony Partridge, Alan J. Chaset, William B. Eldridge
January 1, 1978

This paper is an introduction to understanding the relationship between a judge's sentence of imprisonment and the actions of those agencies that have responsibility for an offender after sentencing.

Anthony Partridge, Alan J. Chaset, William B. Eldridge
October 18, 1977

Remarks at the Sentencing Institute for the Second and Seventh Circuits, Morgantown, West Virginia. Also includes materials distributed at the Institute.

Larry C. Farmer
January 1, 1977

An evaluation of study commitments under 18 U.S. C. Sections 4205(c) and 5010(e). The report concludes that the objective of observation and study--obtaining professional evaluations to support sentencing decisions--has not been met. The author proposes a new model for these studies.

Anthony Partridge, James B. Eaglin
January 1, 1977

A comparison of sentencing practices in fiscal 1976 with sentencing proposals offered in the second session of the 95th Congress.

Sentencing Institute for the Sixth and Seventh Circuits
November 11, 1975

This document was used during a Sentencing Institute for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits, held November 11-14, 1975. Using a hypothetical case, it presents:

William B. Eldridge, Anthony Partridge
January 1, 1974

The report on a sentencing experiment that revealed substantial disparity in determining both the need for incarceration and the lengths of prison terms to be imposed. Matters of disparity and the effects of particular case characteristics are discussed.

Committee on Criminal Appeals of the Advisory Council on Appellate Justice
January 1, 1973

General propositions and recommended procedures to expedite the processing of criminal appeals. The suggestions for handling these cases are designed to achieve a fair and complete review within ninety days from imposition of sentence.

October 25, 1969

An ongoing compilation of information that federal district judges have found useful for immediate bench or chambers reference.

Pages

Subscribe to Sentencing