Federal Judicial Center Operational Status:

Due to a lapse in appropriations, the Federal Judicial Center (Center) has ceased all non-excepted activities until funding is restored.

The Center will post any changes in operational status on this web page. Please check back for updates.

Discovery & Disclosure

Displaying 101 - 110 of 493, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990: Final Report Alternative Proposals for Reduction of Cost and Delay Assessment of Principles, Guidelines & Techniques

Judicial Conference, Leonidas Ralph Mecham

May 1, 1997

L. Ralph Mecham transmits to Congress the Judicial Conference's 6-part final report on the CJRA including analysis of CJRA implementation, alternative plans for cost and delay reduction, and techniques, guidelines, and principles of CJRA efforts.

1996 Annual Assessment of the Civil Justice Reform Act Plan for the Middle District of Louisiana

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Middle District of Louisiana, Richard T. Martin

April 8, 1997

Clerk of the Court Richard T. Martin encloses the Middle District of Louisiana Civil Justice Advisory Group's Periodic Assessment for 1996 in a letter to Recipients of the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan.

Amended Order M-10-468: Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York

Thomas Poole Griesa

March 31, 1997

Local Rules Adopted by the Boards of Judges of the-United States District Courts for the-Southern and Eastern Districts of New York-Effective April 15, 1997.

Implementation of Disclosure in United States District Courts, With Specific Attention to Courts' Responses to Selected Amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 [Superseded]

Donna J. Stienstra

March 28, 1997

Updates the March 22, 1996 report on the federal district courts' responses to the 1993 amendments to FRCP 26. Tables describe courts' local rules, general orders, and CJRA plans by indicating which of five key provisions of Rule 26 are in effect.

District of New Hampshire First Annual Assessment of the Advisory Group Adopted Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of New Hampshire

March 3, 1997

The annual assessment includes survey results and statistical analysis of the civil and criminal workloads

Southern District of California Annual Assessment 1996 (Draft)

Michael J. Koziel, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Southern District of California

March 1, 1997

A draft of the 1996 Periodic Assessment for the Southern District of California

Southern District of Ohio 1996 Annual Assessment of the Advisory Group

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Southern District of Ohio

January 1, 1997

Periodic Assessment of civil justice reform efforts in the Southern District of Ohio for 1996

Discovery and Disclosure Practice, Problems, and Proposals for Change: A Case-based National Survey of Counsel in Closed Federal Civil Cases

Thomas E. Willging, John E. Shapard, Donna J. Stienstra, D. Dean P. Miletich

January 1, 1997

At the request of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, the Center conducted a study of the discovery process, examining the extent to which discovery is used, the frequency and nature of problems in discovery, the impact of the 1993 amendments, and whether additional rule ch

Civil Justice Reform Act Annual Assessment Report for the Western District of Arkansas

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Western District of Arkansas

December 30, 1996

The 1996 Periodic Assessment for the Western District of Arkansas

June 1996 Annual Report of the Advisory Group of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsyllvania

Robert M. Landis, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

August 30, 1996

Advisory Group chairman Robert M. Landis transmits the June 1996 Annual Report of the Advisory Group of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here