You are here

Case Management

Displaying 381 - 390 of 1399, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
January 6, 1995

Report Amended to Reflect Cases Directly Assigned Reporting Period of 11/01/1994 through 11/30/1994 for Divisional Office 3 (Baton Rouge)

Frank G. Johns
January 3, 1995

Clerk of the Court for the Western District of North Carolina Frank G. Johns transmits an amended version of his district's Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan (approved by the court on December 16, 1994) to Administrative Office director L. Ralph Mecham.

David E. Rauma, Donna J. Stienstra
January 1, 1995

An overview of the U.S. district courts' Civil Justice Reform Act expense and delay reduction plans. Seventeen tables summarize the courts' civil case management procedures and techniques in terms of common elements, such as service of process, motions, and alternative dispute resolution.

Donna J. Stienstra, Thomas E. Willging
January 1, 1995

Long Range Planning Series, Paper No. 4

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of South Carolina
December 31, 1994

The 1994 Periodic Assessment conducted by the Civil Justice Advisory Group of the District of South Carolina

Wilbur Dawson Owens Jr.
December 5, 1994

Chief Judge Wilbur D. Owens transmits the 1994 Periodic Assessment for the Middle District of Georgia to Ann C. Williams, Chair of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management. The assessment was originally submitted 12/1/1994 and transmitted to Williams on 12/5/1994

Sylvia H. Rambo, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
December 2, 1994

Chief Judge Sylvia H. Rambo transmits a revised copy of the Middle District of Pennsylvania's Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 Expense and Delay Reduction Plan to Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham. The plan was adopted September 1993, then revised October 1st, 1994.

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of Colorado
December 1, 1994

The 1994 Periodic Assessment conducted by the Civil Justice Advisory Group of the District of Colorado

William W Schwarzer, Donna J. Stienstra, David W. McKeague, Wayne D. Brazil, William Roy Wilson Jr., Genevra Kay Loveland, D. Brock Hornby, Carrie J. Menkel-Meadow
December 1, 1994

Based on presentations and discussions at a conference for federal judges held in late 1993, articles in this issue of FJC Directions acquaint readers with the context in which ADR is developing, define the principal types of ADR used in the federal courts, document the development and emerging r

Pages

Subscribe to Case Management