Argument

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Classified Argument Review Order

Vaughn R. Walker

June 6, 2006

Order, Hepting v. AT&T, No. 3:06-cv-672 (N.D. Cal. June 6, 2006), D.E. 171, 2006 WL 1581965.

The Pre-Argument Conference Program in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

James B. Eaglin

January 1, 1990

A study conducted at the court's request to determine if its program met its goals of saving judges' time, lessening case-management burdens, and simplifying issues on appeal.

The Role of Staff Attorneys and Face-to-Face Conferencing in Non-Argument Decisionmaking: A View from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Donna J. Stienstra, Joe S. Cecil

January 1, 1989

Using materials obtained through interviews with the court of appeals' judges and staff attorneys, as well as visiting judges, the authors discuss the procedure used by the court for selecting and deciding cases suitable for disposition without argument.

Attitudes of United States Judges Toward Limitation of Oral Argument and Opinion-Writing in the United States Courts of Appeals

Jerry Goldman

January 1, 1975

The results of a survey undertaken for the Commission on Revision of the Federal Court Appellate System, in which the attitudes of federal judges regarding appellate oral argument and opinion-writing practices were explored.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Argument

Classified Argument Review Order

The Pre-Argument Conference Program in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Role of Staff Attorneys and Face-to-Face Conferencing in Non-Argument Decisionmaking: A View from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Attitudes of United States Judges Toward Limitation of Oral Argument and Opinion-Writing in the United States Courts of Appeals