In this module, Amanda C. Pustilnik, professor of law at the University of Maryland, discusses approaches that judges could employ when evaluating emerging neurotechnology. She provides insight into the following questions:

• What sort of framework can judges use in their approach to evaluating emerging neurotechnology?
• Should there be specific standards for using neuroscience evidence?
• What emerging technology do you foresee or predict lawyers will attempt to introduce as evidence in the near future?

Objectives:

• to identify potential standards for neuroscience evidence
• to examine emerging neurotechnology from which the court could benefit

To learn more about Amanda Pustilnik, click here.