N.D. Cal.

Displaying 61 - 70 of 90, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Memo: Judge Peckham Testimony on the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

Karen K. Siegel, Robert F. Peckham

June 18, 1990

Karen K. Siegel transmits a draft of Judge Robert F. Peckham's prepared statement on the Title I of S. 2648 to fellow judges for review

Memo: Draft Of The Robert F. Peckham Prepared Statement

Karen K. Siegel

June 15, 1990

Karen K. Siegel transmits a draft of Judge Peckham's testimony to members of the Peckham subcommittee

Letter: Federal Practice Committee of the District Court for the District of Minnesota

John Francis Nangle, John M. Mason, John R. Tunheim

June 15, 1990

The Federal Pracice Committee of the District Court for the District of Minnesota's letter to Senator Biden regarding the Biden Bill (S. 2648). Forwarded to Robert F. Peckham by John F. Nangle

Statement By The Honorable Robert F. Peckham About Title I Of S. 2648 Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plans

Robert F. Peckham

June 1, 1990

Robert F. Peckham's prepared testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee

Memos: Comments on Civil Justice Reform Act

William R. Burchill Jr., Robert F. Peckham, Sam Clyde Pointer Jr.

June 1, 1990

Correspondence between judges and Administrative Office employees regarding S. 2648

Memo: Robert F. Peckham to Senator Biden

Robert F. Peckham

May 23, 1990

Judge Robert F. Peckham shares his position on the Civil Justice Reform Act with Senator Joseph R. Biden

Fax: Suggestions for Editing/Revising Most Recent Version of Biden Bill.

Wayne D. Brazil

May 14, 1990

Magistrate Wayne D. Brazil offers commentary, edits, and annotations on the Biden Bill in a fax to Robert E. Feidler, Greg Scott, and Karen K. Siegel

Letters: Correspondence Concerning S. 2027

James D. Ellis, Veryl L. Riddle, Robert H. Duesenberg, Walter A. Suhre, Patrick W. Durick, John Francis Nangle

May 2, 1990

Correspondence to Congress members from judges and lawyers discussing the Biden Bill and the Judicial Conference's plan for reform. This Correspondence is summarized and attached to letter from Judge John F. Nangle to Judge Robert F. Peckham

Joint Statement Concerning the Proposed Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, S. 2027, H.R. 3839

Robert F. Peckham, Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Federal Bar Counsel, New York County Lawyers Association, New York State Bar Association

April 18, 1990

Robert F. Peckham forwards to members of the Civil Justice Reform Act Subcommittee this joint statement of four New York bar associations concerning the Biden Bill

Letter: Key Differences Between the Four Bills to Be Discussed at the 4/17/90 Meeting