You are here

Research Reports

Displaying 311 - 320 of 337, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
January 1, 1974

These guidelines were first devised for a pilot project in four U.S. District Courts to evaluate the use of videotape, and to develop rules and procedures for the future use of videotape in the courts. The graphics in this publication are crude, hand drawn figures.

Leonard H. Goodman, Thomas F. Drury, William B. Stevenson
January 1, 1974

A report prepared for the Commission on Revision of the Federal Court Appellate System

June 23, 1973

In response to concerns expressed about delay in transmission of proposed opinions and emergency motion papers among the widely-scattered judges of the Temporary Court of Emergency Appeals (TECA), the Federal Judicial Center conducted a pilot project experimenting with the use of IBM Magnetic Car

Committee on Criminal Appeals of the Advisory Council on Appellate Justice
January 1, 1973

General propositions and recommended procedures to expedite the processing of criminal appeals. The suggestions for handling these cases are designed to achieve a fair and complete review within ninety days from imposition of sentence.

James E. Langner, Steven Flanders
January 1, 1973

A description of procedures in six stages of the appellate process: notification, documentation, argumentation, decision, publication, and mandate.

January 1, 1973

A detailed listing of books, articles, and other research dealing with the operation of the appellate courts in general and reform of practices and procedures in particular.

J. Woodford Howard Jr.
January 1, 1973

Summarizes how the judges of two circuits assess certain significant characteristics of their courts: (1) the memorandum system of deliberation in the Second Circuit; and (2) the 15-judge size of the Fifth Circuit. Data were developed from interviews conducted during 1969-70.

Committee on the Use of Appellate Court Energies of the Advisory Council on Appellate Justice
January 1, 1973

A report on procedures for determining whether an opinion should be published and whether an unpublished opinion may be cited to or by a court. The report recommends that opinions be published only if certain defined standards are satisfied. A proposed model court rule is included.

Paul A. Freund, Bernard G. Segal
December 19, 1972

The conclusions of a panel of scholars and practitioners, commonly known as the Freund Commission Report, who were assembled to study the caseload of the Supreme Court, identify problems, and recommend jurisdictional and procedural changes to assist in remedying those problems.

Pages

Subscribe to Research Reports