Hearings

Displaying 1 - 10 of 25, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Romero v. Bahamonde, 857 Fed. App’x 576 (11th Cir. 2021)

James D. Garbolino

November 16, 2022

Objection of the Child | Manner of Hearing | Wishes vs. Objections | Immigration Status and Settlement

The Bail Reform Act of 1984, Fourth Edition

Jefri Wood

October 4, 2022

** Please note that due to limited inventory, we are not able to fulfill bulk requests. Please limit the order to 1 copy (and no more than 3 copies).

Results of a Survey of U.S. District and Magistrate Judges: Use of Virtual Technology to Hold Court Proceedings

Carly E. Giffin, Rebecca N. Eyre

May 31, 2022

This report summarizes the responses to a survey conducted by the Federal Judicial Center in July 2021 to collect the experiences and insights of U.S.

Term Talk: Jones v. Mississippi, Edwards v. Vannoy

James A. Chance, Suzanna Sherry, Laurie Levenson

October 28, 2021

Constitutional Criminal Law. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s elimination of the Watershed Exception for procedural rule changes in Edwards v. Vannoy, and the lack of need for specific findings in life without parole sentencing of juveniles in Jones v. Mississippi.

Case Commentary: Nowlan v. Nowlan, Civil Action No. 5:20cv00102, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10824 (W.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2021)

James D. Garbolino

March 19, 2021

Videoconference Testimony | Sixth Amendment Right to Confront and the Hague Convention

In this case, the petitioner made a pretrial request to appear by videoconference.

Holdings

Case Commentary: Pope v. Lunday, No. 20-6003, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

February 16, 2021

Habitual Residence of Infants | Lack of Necessity of Evidentiary Hearing

Remote Participation in Bankruptcy Court Proceedings

Elizabeth C. Wiggins

November 15, 2017

This guide on the use of distance participation (DP) technology to conduct bankruptcy hearings and trials provides an overview of general considerations, ranging from philosophical to practical, and then examines separately the use of the teleconferencing and videoconferencing.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Hearings

Case Commentary: Romero v. Bahamonde, 857 Fed. App’x 576 (11th Cir. 2021)

The Bail Reform Act of 1984, Fourth Edition

Results of a Survey of U.S. District and Magistrate Judges: Use of Virtual Technology to Hold Court Proceedings

Term Talk: Jones v. Mississippi, Edwards v. Vannoy

Case Commentary: Nowlan v. Nowlan, Civil Action No. 5:20cv00102, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10824 (W.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2021)

Case Commentary: Pope v. Lunday, No. 20-6003, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 36618 (10th Cir. Nov. 20, 2020)

Remote Participation in Bankruptcy Court Proceedings

Chapter 9 Online Repository: Notice and Websites

Appendix H-7: Northern District of Texas — Order for Petitioner's Participation at Hearing via Video Teleconference

Appendix H-6: Northern District of Texas — Order Setting Hearing

Pages