Standing

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Term Talk: Murthy v. Missouri; National Rifle Assoc. v. Vullo

Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael McConnell, Elizabeth C. Wiggins

September 19, 2024

First Amendment. Government Speech. Experts analyze whether government speech infringed on others' speech rights, in Murthy v. Missouri, and the government’s unconstitutional use of retaliation to suppress disfavored speech in National Rifle Association v. Vullo.

Dismissal for Lack of Standing

February 23, 2024

Opinion, Long v. Garland, No. 1:15-cv-1642 (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 2024), D.E. 80, 2024 WL 761850, appeals pending, Docket Sheet, No. 24-1403 (4th Cir. May 7, 2024); Docket Sheet, No. 24-1369 (4th Cir. Apr. 30, 2024).

Term Talk: California v. Texas, Transunion v. Ramirez, Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

James A. Chance, Suzanna Sherry, Evan Lee

October 21, 2021

Standing. Experts discuss the novel theory of standing by inseverability, limitations on Congress’ ability to confer standing through legislation, and the questions raised by allowing nominal damages to save some completed harms from mootness.

Case Commentary: Jacquety v. Baptista, 2020 WL 5946562 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

November 25, 2020

Jurisdiction | Standing | Redressability

Term Talk: June Medical v. Russo, Little Sisters v. Pennsylvania

Erwin Chemerinsky, James A. Chance, Melissa Murray

October 20, 2020

Reproductive Freedom. Experts discuss the constitutionality of admitting privileges requirements for abortion providers, and whether exceptions to ACA-required contraceptive coverage can be administratively expanded to include moral objection.

Securities Litigation

Jayme J. Herschkopf

June 28, 2017

This guide is designed to offer judges an introduction to the law and practice of securities litigation. It provides an overview of the types of legal and practical issues judges may confront in litigation arising under the securities laws, and, where possible, offers suggestions.

Case Commentary: Sanchez v. R.G.L., 761 F.3d 495 (5th Cir. 2014)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Unaccompanied Alien Children | Standing to Appeal

Facts

Federal Judicial Center

You are here