Mootness

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Supreme Court Denial of Mootness

Neil M. Gorsuch

March 19, 2024

FBI v. Fikre, 401 U.S. ___, 144 S. Ct. 771 (2024), aff’g 35 F.4th 762 (9th Cir. 2022), rev’g Opinion, No. 3:13-cv-899 (D. Or. Aug. 12, 2020), D.E. 164, 2020 WL 4677516.

Case Commentary: Bordelais v. Bordelais, 844 F. App’x 910 (7th Cir. 2021)

James D. Garbolino

November 16, 2022

Age of Child | Attorney Fees and Costs

In this case, the Seventh Circuit addressed the loss of jurisdiction when a child turns sixteen years of age and whether sanctions were warranted for a frivolous appeal.

Holdings

Term Talk: California v. Texas, Transunion v. Ramirez, Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

James A. Chance, Suzanna Sherry, Evan Lee

October 21, 2021

Standing. Experts discuss the novel theory of standing by inseverability, limitations on Congress’ ability to confer standing through legislation, and the questions raised by allowing nominal damages to save some completed harms from mootness.

Case Commentary: Custodio v. Samillan, 842 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2016)

James D. Garbolino

April 18, 2017

Child’s Objection to Return | Mootness

Case Commentary: Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013)

James D. Garbolino

February 2, 2016

Mootness | Stays | Expeditious Handling

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Mootness

Supreme Court Denial of Mootness

Case Commentary: Bordelais v. Bordelais, 844 F. App’x 910 (7th Cir. 2021)

Term Talk: California v. Texas, Transunion v. Ramirez, Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski

Case Commentary: Custodio v. Samillan, 842 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2016)

Case Commentary: Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017 (2013)