Summary Judgment

Displaying 1 - 10 of 21, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Summary Judgment for the Government

Brantley Starr

March 22, 2023

Opinion, Kovac v. Wray, No. 3:18-cv-110 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2023), D.E. 102, 660 F. Supp. 3d 555, appeal pending, No. 23-10284 (5th Cir. docketed Mar. 22, 2023) (oral argument scheduled for March 11, 2024).

Case Commentary: West v. Dobrev, 735 F.3d 921 (10th Cir. 2013)

James D. Garbolino

March 5, 2016

Summary Judgment | Sua Sponte Orders

In Their Words: Attorney Views About Costs and Procedures in Federal Civil Litigation

Emery G. Lee, Thomas E. Willging

March 1, 2010

This report presents the results of interviews of a small group of attorneys who had completed the Center's case-based survey on the costs of litigation under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Dismissal Order

Vaughn R. Walker

January 21, 2010

Order, Jewel v. NSA, No. 4:08-cv-4373 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2010), D.E. 703, 2010 WL 235075.

Briefing Order

Vaughn R. Walker

June 6, 2009

Order, In re NSA Telecommunication Records Litigation, No. 3:06-md-1791 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2009), D.E. 643.

Report on Summary Judgment Practice Across Districts with Variations in Local Rules

Joe S. Cecil, George W. Cort

August 13, 2008

The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules asked the Federal Judicial Center to examine summary judgment practice across federal district courts as a means of assessing the potential impact of proposed amendments to Rul

Denial of Reconsideration

Thomas F. Hogan

January 29, 2008

Opinion, Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice, No. 1:07-cv-403 (D.D.C. Jan. 29, 2008), D.E. 23, 532 F. Supp. 2d 22.

A Quarter-Century of Summary Judgment Practice in Six Federal District Courts

Joe S. Cecil, Rebecca N. Eyre, D. Dean P. Miletich, David Rindskopf

December 1, 2007

Report of a Federal Judicial Center study of summary judgment practice in six federal district courts during six time periods over twenty-five years (1975-2000), to determine whether summary judgment activity has increased over time and to what extent changes in summary judgment practice are due

FJC Research Brief, No. 2: Trends in Summary Judgment Practice: 1975-2000

Joe S. Cecil, Rebecca N. Eyre, D. Dean P. Miletich, David Rindskopf

December 1, 2007

For the full 33-page report see Trends in Summary Judgment Practice: 1975-2000 (2007).

Initial Report on Summary Judgment Practice Across Districts with Variations in Local Rules

Joe S. Cecil, George W. Cort

November 2, 2007

The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules asked the Federal Judicial Center to examine summary judgment practice across federal district courts as a means of assessing the potential impact of the proposed amendments to Rule 56.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Summary Judgment