You are here

Summary Judgment

Displaying 1 - 10 of 21, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Brantley Starr
July 22, 2024

Opinion, Kovac v. Wray, No. 3:18-cv-110 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2023), D.E. 102, 660 F. Supp. 3d 555, aff'd, Opinion, No. 23-10284 (5th Cir. July 22, 2024), D.E. 79-1, 109 F.4th 331.

James D. Garbolino
March 5, 2016

Summary Judgment | Sua Sponte Orders

Emery G. Lee, Thomas E. Willging
March 1, 2010

This report presents the results of interviews of a small group of attorneys who had completed the Center's case-based survey on the costs of litigation under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Vaughn R. Walker
January 21, 2010

Order, Jewel v. NSA, No. 4:08-cv-4373 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2010), D.E. 703, 2010 WL 235075.

Vaughn R. Walker
June 6, 2009

Order, In re NSA Telecommunication Records Litigation, No. 3:06-md-1791 (N.D. Cal. June 5, 2009), D.E. 643.

Joe S. Cecil, George W. Cort
August 13, 2008

The Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules asked the Federal Judicial Center to examine summary judgment practice across federal district courts as a means of assessing the potential impact of proposed amendments to Rul

Thomas F. Hogan
January 29, 2008

Opinion, Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice, No. 1:07-cv-403 (D.D.C. Jan. 29, 2008), D.E. 23, 532 F. Supp. 2d 22.

Joe S. Cecil, Rebecca N. Eyre, D. Dean P. Miletich, David Rindskopf
December 1, 2007

For the full 33-page report see Trends in Summary Judgment Practice: 1975-2000 (2007).

Joe S. Cecil, Rebecca N. Eyre, D. Dean P. Miletich, David Rindskopf
December 1, 2007

Report of a Federal Judicial Center study of summary judgment practice in six federal district courts during six time periods over twenty-five years (1975-2000), to determine whether summary judgment activity has increased over time and to what extent changes in summary judgment practice are due

Joe S. Cecil, George W. Cort
November 2, 2007

The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules asked the Federal Judicial Center to examine summary judgment practice across federal district courts as a means of assessing the potential impact of the proposed amendments to Rule 56.

Pages

Subscribe to Summary Judgment