Skip to main content

You are here

Protective Orders

Displaying 1 - 10 of 18, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

National Security Prosecutions: Protective Orders

April 4, 2014

Assembled here are protective orders used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Among the most important goals of the protective orders here is the protection of classified information.

Confidential Discovery: A Pocket Guide on Protective Orders

Robert Timothy Reagan

July 8, 2012

Among the reasons that courts issue protective orders in both civil and criminal cases is to keep discovery confidential on a showing of good cause. Experience has proved confidentiality protective orders to grease the wheels of discovery in many cases.

National Security Prosecutions: Protective Orders [Superseded]

June 1, 2011

Assembled here are protective orders used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Among the most important goals of the protective orders here is the protection of classified information.

Protective Order

Michael Robert Hogan

March 19, 2010

Protective Order, United States v. Sedaghaty, No. 6:05-cr-60008 (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010), D.E. 297.

Classified Information Protective Order

Louise W. Flanagan

February 18, 2010

Protective Order, United States v. Boyd, No. 5:09-cr-216 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 18, 2010), D.E. 237.

Substitution Protective Order 3

John R. Tunheim

July 9, 2009

Protective Order, United States v. Warsame, No. 0:04-cr-29 (D. Minn. July 9, 2009), D.E. 173.

Exhibit III-2. Sample Discovery Order

January 1, 2009

Substitution Protective Order 2

John R. Tunheim

October 3, 2008

Protective Order, United States v. Warsame, No. 0:04-cr-29 (D. Minn. Oct. 3, 2008), D.E. 144.

Substitution Protective Order 1

John R. Tunheim

April 20, 2007

Protective Order, United States v. Warsame, No. 0:04-cr-29 (D. Minn. Apr. 20, 2007), D.E. 102.

In Camera Ex Parte Protective Order

Garland E. Burrell Jr.

December 21, 2006

Order, United States v. Hayat, No. 2:05-cr-240 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 21, 2006), D.E. 446.

Pages