Pretrial

Displaying 311 - 320 of 368, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Joint Statement Concerning the Proposed Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, S. 2027, H.R. 3839

Robert F. Peckham, Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Federal Bar Counsel, New York County Lawyers Association, New York State Bar Association

April 18, 1990

Robert F. Peckham forwards to members of the Civil Justice Reform Act Subcommittee this joint statement of four New York bar associations concerning the Biden Bill

Letter: Key Differences Between the Four Bills to Be Discussed at the 4/17/90 Meeting

Wayne D. Brazil

April 17, 1990

Magistrate Wayne D. Brazil summarizes the different drafts of the Biden Bill as discussed by the executive committee in this letter to Karen K. Siegel

Memo: Draft Plans of the Judicial Conference

Karen K. Siegel, Robert E. Fiedler, Greg Scott, Wayne D. Brazil, Sarah Evans Barker

April 16, 1990

Karen K. Siegel sends drafts of Judicial Conference alternatives to the Biden Bill to members of the subcommittee on the bill

Letters: Judge Parker Critiques S. 2027

Robert Howell Hall, Leonidas Ralph Mecham

April 13, 1990

Robert H. Hall of the Northern District of Georgia writes to Georgia Senator Sam Nunn regarding S. 2027. He forwards his letter to Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham, who replies.

Memo: to the Subcommittee on the Biden Bill (S. 2027)

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, William Hubbs Rehnquist, Robert E. Fiedler, Greg Scott

April 6, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham transmits proposed revisions to the Biden Bill and a letter from Chief Justice William Rehnquist to members of the Judicial Conference Subcommittee on the Biden Bill.

Memo: to the Subcommittee on the Biden Bill (S. 2027)

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, William Hubbs Rehnquist, Robert E. Fiedler, Greg Scott

April 6, 1990

Memo to the Chief Justice: Your Meeting with Senator Biden and the Judicial Conference Statement of Priniciples Re S. 2027

Leonidas Ralph Mecham

March 29, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham shares updates and a copy of the Judicial Conference Statement of Principles with Chief Justice Rehnquist prior to his meeting with Senator Joseph R. Biden

Memo: Two Alternatives to Biden Bill

Karen K. Siegel, Robert E. Fiedler, Greg Scott, Wayne D. Brazil

March 28, 1990

Karen K. Siegel provides members of the Judicial Conference with alternative case management plans

Letter: Judge Lenore C. Nesbitt to Senator Robert Graham

Lenore Carrero Nesbitt

March 20, 1990

Judge Lenore C. Nesbitt of the Southern District of Florida provides commentary on S. 2027 and information on her current case management strategies in a letter to Senator Robert Graham. Judge Nesbitt forwards the letter to Administrative Office Deputy Director James E. Macklin

Major Differences Between S. 2027 and Proposed Revision Dated March 13, 1990

March 13, 1990

An overview of proposed revisions to S. 2027 and the difference between the revised version and its current form

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Pretrial

Joint Statement Concerning the Proposed Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, S. 2027, H.R. 3839

Letter: Key Differences Between the Four Bills to Be Discussed at the 4/17/90 Meeting

Memo: Draft Plans of the Judicial Conference

Letters: Judge Parker Critiques S. 2027

Memo: to the Subcommittee on the Biden Bill (S. 2027)

Memo: to the Subcommittee on the Biden Bill (S. 2027)

Memo to the Chief Justice: Your Meeting with Senator Biden and the Judicial Conference Statement of Priniciples Re S. 2027

Memo: Two Alternatives to Biden Bill

Letter: Judge Lenore C. Nesbitt to Senator Robert Graham

Major Differences Between S. 2027 and Proposed Revision Dated March 13, 1990

Pages