You are here

Limiting Discovery

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Jayme J. Herschkopf
December 29, 2017

This guide summarizes issues related to third-party financing of civil litigation. It discusses how judges might manage cases involving litigation financing, including ethical issues, legal issues raised by financing agreements, and discovery issues related to such agreements. 

Leonie M. Brinkema
August 29, 2003

Opinion, United States v. Moussaoui, No. 1:01-cr-455 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2003), D.E. 1033.

Alvin K. Hellerstein
July 24, 2002

Order, Mariani v. United Air Lines, No. 1:01-cv-11628 (S.D.N.Y. July 24, 2002), D.E. 20, 2002 WL 1685382.

Thomas E. Willging
February 23, 1998

Memorandum to the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Civil Rules identifying two districts, the Northern District of Alabama and the Central District of California, as examples of "the 'middle ground' between current requirements and abolition of disclosure requirements."

Thomas E. Willging
February 23, 1998

Memorandum to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules expanding on earlier report on time limits on discovery. Findings are based on data gathered from a survey of counsel in 1,000 closed civil cases and differed from findings Rand Corp. presented to the committee.

Marie Leary
February 1, 1998

Conducted at the request of Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, the report describes the local rules or practices in all ninety-four federal districts regarding numerical limitations on interrogatories and depositions and durational limits on depositions.

Thomas E. Willging
December 22, 1997

Memorandum to the Judicial Conference Subcommittee on Discovery of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules assisting review of a proposal to limit the length of depositions. Findings were based on data gathered from counsel surveyed on duration of depositions in 1,000 closed civil cases.

Paul R. J. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
January 1, 1978

A description of the use of the discovery rules then in effect in a sample of more than 3,000 cases from six district courts. The report provides quantitative information on each discovery device and on discovery motions.

Subscribe to Limiting Discovery