Hearsay (801-807)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Term Talk: Smith v. Arizona; Diaz v. United States

Evan Lee, Laurie Levenson, Francesca Wiilliams

November 21, 2024

Criminal Law. Sixth Amendment. Expert Testimony. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s guidelines for determining when reports prepared by analysts are testimonial in Smith v. Arizona, and in Diaz v. United States, the limitations of FRE 704(b) on expert testimony about the defendant’s mental when an essential element of the charge.

Amendments to the Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure: Evidence 2019—The Residual Hearsay Exception

January 7, 2020

In 2019, the residual hearsay exception, Federal Rules of Evidence 807, was amended to fix a number of problems that courts had encountered applying the rule.

Review of Scientific Literature on the Reliability of Present Sense Impressions and Excited Utterances

Timothy T. Lau

March 5, 2016

This review of scientific literature regarding the reliability of present sense impressions and excited utterances as it pertains to the Federal Rules of Evidence was presented as a memorandum to the Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

Survey of District Court Judges on a Proposed Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) Concerning Prior Consistent Statements

Tim Reagan, Margaret S. Williams

March 2, 2012

This report was prepared for the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Under the current version of Fed. R. Evid.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Hearsay (801-807)

Term Talk: Smith v. Arizona; Diaz v. United States

Amendments to the Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure: Evidence 2019—The Residual Hearsay Exception

Review of Scientific Literature on the Reliability of Present Sense Impressions and Excited Utterances

Survey of District Court Judges on a Proposed Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) Concerning Prior Consistent Statements