You are here

Federal Judicial Branch Governance & Administration

Displaying 121 - 130 of 270, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
January 1, 2001

In response to requests from chief judges and as a follow-up to a 2000 conference for appellate judges, the Center developed this common template that each circuit could use to develop its own deskbook for chief judges.

Federal Judicial Center
January 1, 2001

The Center's report on research and education activities in 2000, submitted to the Judicial Conference of the United States as required by statute.

Jennifer Evans Marsh
January 1, 2001

Superseded by The Use of Visiting Judges in the Federal District Courts: A Guide for Judges and Court Personnel (updated 2003).In 1999, at the direction of the Judicial Officers Resources Working Group appointed by the Chief Justice, the Center conducted studies of the use of visiting judges in t

Federal Judicial Center
January 1, 2000

The Center's report on research and education activities in 1999, submitted to the Judicial Conference of the United States as required by statute.

Elizabeth C. Wiggins, Judith A. McKenna
January 1, 2000

Under the current bankruptcy appellate system, appeals from dispositive orders of bankruptcy judges are taken to the district court or to the bankruptcy appellate panel, if one has been established and the district has chosen to participate, with further appeal as of right to the court of appeals

Marie Leary, Robert J. Niemic, Melissa Deckman Fallon
March 1, 1999

Bankruptcy courts are different from the district courts in the attorney conduct area in that attorneys who practice in bankruptcy courts are subject to a complex statutory system, which includes bankruptcy-specific conflict of interest criteria and other standards directly governing attorney con

Carol L. Krafka, Marie Leary, Joe S. Cecil, Naomi Medvin
January 1, 1999

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides for disclosure of financial information from corporate parties in the courts of appeals. The purpose of the rule is to assist appellate judges in identifying if they have financial conflicts of interest for recusal purposes.

Federal Judicial Center
January 1, 1999

The Center's report on research and education activities in 1998, submitted to the Judicial Conference of the United States as required by statute.

Federal Judicial Center
January 1, 1998

Report submitted to the Judicial Conference of the United States, as directed by statute, describing the work of the Center for the calendar year.

James S. Kakalik, Terence Dunworth, Laural A. Hill, Daniel McCaffrey, Marian Oshiro, Nicholas M. Pace, Mary E. Vaiana
January 29, 1997

Institute for Civil Justice, Rand Corporation.

Pages

Subscribe to Federal Judicial Branch Governance & Administration