You are here

Discovery & Disclosure

Displaying 141 - 150 of 492, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Northern District of Oklahoma
May 2, 1995

The 1995 Periodic Assessment for the Northern District of Oklahoma

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of New Jersey, Ronald J. Hedges, William T. Walsh
April 28, 1995

Magistrate Judge Ronald J. Hedges and Clerk of the Court William T. Walsh transmit the Third Annual Assessment of the District of New Jersey's Expense and Delay Reduction Plan to Donna Stienstra of the Federal Judicial Center and Abel J. Mattos and Frederick M.

Richard H. Weare
April 27, 1995

District Court Executive/Clerk of the Court Richard H. Weare transmits the March 1995 Periodic Assessment for the District of Arizona toL. Ralph Mecham of the Administrative Office

Richard H. Weare
April 25, 1995

District Court Executive/Clerk of the Court Richard H. Weare transmits the March 1995 Periodic Assessment for the District of Arizona to Abel J. Mattos of the Administrative Office

Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of Maine
April 21, 1995

Results, responses, and commentary from the survey on the effects of the Civil Justice Reform Act conducted by the advisory group of the District of Maine.

Thelton E. Henderson, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Northern District of California
April 11, 1995

1994 Periodic Assessment of civil justice reform efforts in the Northern District of California, enclosed with a letter from Chief Judge Thelton E. Henderson to Abel J. Mattos of the Administrative Office and Donna Stienstra of the Federal Judicial Center.

Gary Lee, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the Southern District of New York
April 4, 1995

Assistant District Executive Gary Lee encloses the Southern District of New York's second periodic assessment of civil justice reform efforts in a letter to Frederick M. Russillo of the Administrative Office Court Programs Branch.

Donna J. Stienstra
March 24, 1995

Report on the federal district courts' responses to the 1993 amendments to FRCP 26. Tables describe courts' local rules, general orders, and CJRA plans by indicating which of five key provisions of Rule 26 are in effect.

Naomi Medvin, Elizabeth C. Wiggins, F. James Kearney
March 8, 1995

District-by-district summary and chart of local rules or orders adopted by U.S. Bankruptcy courts responding to 1993 amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26. Also summarizes other discovery-related requirements and patterns found in courts' responses to amendments.

Pages

Subscribe to Discovery & Disclosure