Decision Making

Displaying 21 - 27 of 27, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

In Session: Leading the Judiciary – Episode 23: Leveraging Our Individual Paths to Leadership

Meredith Persily Lamel

October 6, 2021

Meredith Persily Lamel, coauthor of The Six Paths to Leadership: Lessons from Successful Executives, Politicians, Entrepreneurs, and More, discusses the different paths leaders take to arrive at their formal positions of authority, why those paths matter, and the opportunities and challenges inherent in each path so leaders can create more personal satisfaction and greater organizational success.

In Session: Leading the Judiciary – Episode 22: How Rethinking Revolutionizes Decision Making

Adam Grant

August 4, 2021

Adam Grant, author of Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don't Know discusses the value of making the time to rethink and unlearn to achieve personal and organizational success. He encourages leaders to replace “best practices” with a continual search for better practices, and to be humble, curious and receptive, leading to positive change and growth.

In Session: Leading the Judiciary – Episode 6: How to Be a Courageous Follower and Demonstrate Intelligent Disobedience

Ira Chaleff, Lori A. Murphy, Michael E. Siegel

April 3, 2019

Episode 6: An interview with Ira Chaleff, author of The Courageous Follower: Standing Up to and for Our Leaders and Intelligent Disobedience: Doing Right When What You’re Told to Do Is Wrong, and founder and president of Executive Coaching & Consulting Assoc

In Session: Leading the Judiciary – Episode 4: Scientific Secrets of Perfect Timing

Daniel Pink, Michael Eric Siegel, Lori A. Murphy

December 6, 2018

Episode 4: An interview with Daniel Pink, bestselling author, contributing editor at Fast Company and Wired, and business columnist for The Sunday Telegraph.

The Role of Staff Attorneys and Face-to-Face Conferencing in Non-Argument Decisionmaking: A View from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Donna J. Stienstra, Joe S. Cecil

January 1, 1989

Using materials obtained through interviews with the court of appeals' judges and staff attorneys, as well as visiting judges, the authors discuss the procedure used by the court for selecting and deciding cases suitable for disposition without argument.

Small-Group Decision Making and Complex Information Tasks

Michael J. Saks

January 1, 1981

A report on a search of the psychological literature for information about the competence of jurors to find the facts in complex, protracted civil trials.

Decision-Making Procedures in U.S. Courts of Appeals for the 2nd and 5th Circuits

J. Woodford Howard Jr.

January 1, 1973

Summarizes how the judges of two circuits assess certain significant characteristics of their courts: (1) the memorandum system of deliberation in the Second Circuit; and (2) the 15-judge size of the Fifth Circuit. Data were developed from interviews conducted during 1969-70.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here