Attorney Fees

Displaying 101 - 110 of 121, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Order Concerning Settlement 1

Alvin K. Hellerstein

June 28, 2007

Order, In re September 11 Litigation, No. 1:21-mc-97 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 2007, filed June 29, 2007), D.E. 1108.

Research on Appeals of Attorney-Fee and Merits Decisions (Fed R Civ P 58(c)(2)) as Presented to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules in May 2006

Rebecca N. Eyre, Thomas E. Willging, Joe S. Cecil

May 1, 2006

In early 2006, the Federal Judicial Center examined the prevalence of the use of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(c)(2), and the circumstances under which appeals of judgments on the merits and decisions regarding attorney fees can occur at the same time.

Memorandum to All Counsel Appointed Under the Criminal Justice Act — District of Connecticut

March 2, 2006

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 3

March 2, 2006

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 1

March 2, 2006

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 2

March 2, 2006

Order of Referral of Cost Management to Magistrate Judge — District of Connecticut

March 2, 2006

Order Reducing Fees for Non-death Penalty Case — District of Connecticut

March 2, 2006

An Empirical Examination of Attorneys' Choice of Forum in Class Action Litigation

Thomas E. Willging, Shannon R. Wheatman

December 17, 2005

This article presents attorney responses to a national random survey of 728 attorneys who represented plaintiffs and defendants in 621 recently closed class action cases.

Order Raising Hourly Rate for Retained Counsel — District of Connecticut

May 5, 2005

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Attorney Fees

Order Concerning Settlement 1

Research on Appeals of Attorney-Fee and Merits Decisions (Fed R Civ P 58(c)(2)) as Presented to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules in May 2006

Memorandum to All Counsel Appointed Under the Criminal Justice Act — District of Connecticut

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 3

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 1

Memoranda re Budget Meeting with Counsel — District of Connecticut 2

Order of Referral of Cost Management to Magistrate Judge — District of Connecticut

Order Reducing Fees for Non-death Penalty Case — District of Connecticut

An Empirical Examination of Attorneys' Choice of Forum in Class Action Litigation

Order Raising Hourly Rate for Retained Counsel — District of Connecticut

Pages