Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Displaying 401 - 410 of 467, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Memo to the Chief Justice: Your Meeting with Senator Biden and the Judicial Conference Statement of Priniciples Re S. 2027

Leonidas Ralph Mecham

March 29, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham shares updates and a copy of the Judicial Conference Statement of Principles with Chief Justice Rehnquist prior to his meeting with Senator Joseph R. Biden

Memo: Two Alternatives to Biden Bill

Karen K. Siegel, Robert E. Fiedler, Greg Scott, Wayne D. Brazil

March 28, 1990

Karen K. Siegel provides members of the Judicial Conference with alternative case management plans

Letters: Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990. S. 2027 & H.R. 3898

Frederic N. Smalkin, Clarence E. Goetz, J. Frederick Motz

March 22, 1990

Correspondence regarding the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 from members of the District of Maryland

Major Differences Between S. 2027 and Proposed Revision Dated March 13, 1990

March 13, 1990

An overview of proposed revisions to S. 2027 and the difference between the revised version and its current form

Proposed Revisions to S. 2027

March 13, 1990

A list of proposed edits and revisions to S. 2027, probably drafted on behalf of the Judicial Conference. Author unknown.

Letter: Judge Susan H. Black to Senator Robert Graham

Susan H. Black, Richard Schlesinger

March 13, 1990

Judge Susan H. Black of the Middle District of Florida provides commentary on S. 2027 to Senator Robert Graham. She encloses a history of the Federal Magistrates Act of 1968 by U.S. Magistrate Harvey E. Schlesinger.

Memo: Judicial Conference Guidance Regarding S. 2027

Karen K. Siegel, Robert E. Fiedler

March 9, 1990

An updated draft of the Judicial Conference's statement of principles regarding S. 2027, transmitted to the executive committee and Robert F. Peckham by Karen K. Seigel and Robert E. Feidler, respectively

Statement By The Honorable Robert F. Peckham About Title I Of S. 2648 Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plans

Robert F. Peckham

March 6, 1990

The Prepared Statement of Judge Robert F. Peckham as presented in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee

Judiciary Committee Questions for Judges Robinson and Enslen

Richard Alan Enslen, Aubrey Eugene Robinson Jr., Strom Thurmond, Orrin G. Hatch

March 6, 1990

The transcript of the Senate Judiciary Committee testimony of Judges Aubrey E. Robinson and Richard A. Enslen

Prepared Statement of Honorable Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr. Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate on S. 2027,

Aubrey Eugene Robinson Jr.

March 6, 1990

Chief Judge Aubrey E. Robinson's Prepared Statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee on S. 2027

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)

Memo to the Chief Justice: Your Meeting with Senator Biden and the Judicial Conference Statement of Priniciples Re S. 2027

Memo: Two Alternatives to Biden Bill

Letters: Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990. S. 2027 & H.R. 3898

Major Differences Between S. 2027 and Proposed Revision Dated March 13, 1990

Proposed Revisions to S. 2027

Letter: Judge Susan H. Black to Senator Robert Graham

Memo: Judicial Conference Guidance Regarding S. 2027

Statement By The Honorable Robert F. Peckham About Title I Of S. 2648 Civil Justice Expense And Delay Reduction Plans

Judiciary Committee Questions for Judges Robinson and Enslen

Prepared Statement of Honorable Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr. Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia on Behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate on S. 2027,

Pages