You are here
Reports & Studies
Below is a list of a number of past published studies conducted by the Research Division. Some Center reports are not published or made publicly available due to restrictions in place from the source of the research request. Most research reports can be downloaded and in some instances, a hardcopy publication can be requested. See also Manuals, Monographs, & Guides.
Displaying 181 - 190 of 337Title | Date |
---|---|
Voluntary Arbitration in Eight Federal District Courts: An Evaluation A statutorily mandated report on the pilot court-annexed voluntary arbitration programs in eight federal district courts. The study examines program use in the context of the programs' referral systems. It is a companion to the 1990 FJC study of mandatory court-annexed arbitration programs, Court-Annexed Arbitration in Ten District Courts. |
January 1, 1994 |
Decentralized Self-Regulation, Accountability, and Judicial Independence Under the Federal Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 A report prepared for the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal under the title: Administration of the Federal Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980: Final Report. The report is in three parts: (1) a description of the appellate courts' processes for handling conduct and disability matters; (2) a discussion of data on the effects of the Act that the authors collected from interviewing chief circuit judges, circuit executives, and clerks of court, reviewing complaints and orders, and examining statistical data from the AO; and (3) a summary of chief circuit judges' assessments of the value of the Act and suggestions for change. The report presents the views of chief judges on the impact—or lack of impact—of the 1980 Act on judicial independence. Reprinted from 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 25-207 (1994). |
January 1, 1994 |
Electronic Media Coverage of Federal Civil Proceedings: An Evaluation of the Pilot Program in Six District Courts and Two Courts of Appeals An evaluation of the Judicial Conference's 1991-1993 pilot program allowing electronic media coverage of federal civil proceedings in six district and two appellate courts. The report, which was originally presented to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, provides information concerning applications for coverage and proceedings actually covered, as well as a content analysis of news broadcasts incorporating such coverage. It summarizes results from surveys of judges and attorneys in the pilot courts; interviews with judges, court staff administrators, and media representatives; and state studies of the effects of electronic media presence on witnesses and jurors. |
January 1, 1994 |
Planning for the Future: Results of a 1992 Federal Judicial Center Survey of United States Judges Results from the Center's 1992 survey of nearly all federal judges on a wide range of issues of concern to the federal courts. The survey was conducted primarily to inform the deliberations of the Judicial Conference Committee on Long Range Planning and to inform the Center's congressionally mandated study of structural alternatives for the courts of appeals. Results of that study were published in [Structural and Other Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals] (1993), which is also available through this catalog. |
January 1, 1994 |
Guidelines for Using Mailed Questionnaires A "how-to" manual based on the experience of the Research Division staff to help in anticipating the steps involved and to plan for the resources necessary to successfully get information by mail questionnaire. |
September 1, 1993 |
Report of the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal In 1990, Congress created the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal, who's charge included investigation of problems related to the discipline and removal of life-tenured federal judges, and evaluation of alternatives to current arrangements for judicial discipline and removal, including statutory and constitutional amendments. The Commission was instructed to submit its findings and recommendations to the President, Congress, and the Chief Justice of the United States. The Commission held six public hearings during 1992 and 1993, and submitted its final report on August 2, 1993. This report was prepared with the assistance of the Federal Judicial Center. The Federal Judicial Center serves as repository for the Commission's published materials. Although hard copies of the Commission's final report are no longer available for distribution, the report is reprinted at 152 Federal Rules Decisions 265 (1994). The Commission's Research Papers and Hearings remain available for distribution in hard copy. |
August 2, 1993 |
Why Judges Resign: Influences on Federal Judicial Service, 1789 to 1992 Provides a historical perspective on the reasons federal judges have left the bench. The study focuses on the fewer than 200 judges who, over the last 200 years, resigned from the bench for stated reasons other than age or health. The Center prepared the study for the National Commission on Judicial Discipline and Removal. |
January 1, 1993 |
Court-Appointed Experts: Defining the Role of Experts Appointed Under Federal Rule of Evidence 706 A study of why judges rarely appoint experts under Rule 706. In discussing this issue with judges, the authors learned of techniques and procedures that may aid judges when considering whether to appoint an expert or when managing an expert who has been appointed. These suggestions are collected in the final chapter of this report. |
January 1, 1993 |
Structural and Other Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals: Report to the United States Congress and the Judicial Conference of the United States A study requested by the Federal Courts Study Committee Implementation Act of 1990 of the problems facing the federal courts of appeals and the numerous changes, structural and otherwise, that have been suggested as solutions. Areas of concern include the increased volume of appeals, the effects of caseloads on the quality of appellate decision making, intercircuit and intracircuit conflicts, the preservation of appellate traditions, and the scope of federal jurisdiction. The study outlines proposed changes to the structure of the courts, as well as techniques used by judges to keep pace with increased caseloads. The study concludes that no major proposal for change to the structure of the courts would substantially reduce appellate filings in the near future. Related Resources In 1997 Congress created the Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals to study the structure and alignment of the federal appellate system, with particular reference to the Ninth Circuit. In its final report, the Commission recommended several measures to "equip the courts of appeals with an ability, structurally and procedurally, to accommodate continued caseload growth into the indefinite future, while maintaining the quality of the appellate process and delivering consistent decisions--assuming, of course, that the system has the necessary number of judges and other resources." The five-member Commission was chaired by Retired Justice Byron White. All documents published by the Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals, including its Final Report, are available in an electronic research collection that is maintained by the University of North Texas Libraries at http://www.library.unt.edu/gpo/csafca/app_comm_uscourts_gov.html . The University of North Texas Libraries and the U.S. Government Printing Office, in a Federal Depository Library Program partnership, established this site to provide permanent public access to the publications of the Commission on Structural Alternatives for the Federal Courts of Appeals.-The commission was created by Public Law 105-119 on November 26, 1997. This site exists exactly as it did when the Commission closed operation in March 1999. |
January 1, 1993 |
FJC Directions, No. 4 A magazine that reported Center research and education activities in a concise format. In this issue of FJC Directions:
|
August 1, 1992 |