You are here

Term Talk: Erlinger v. United States; Pulsifer v. United States

The nation's top legal scholars discuss what federal judges need to know about the U.S. Supreme Court's most impactful decisions. 

See all episodes

Laurie Levenson, Evan Lee, Francesca Wiilliams
November 21, 2024

Criminal Law. Fifth and Sixth Amendments. First Step Act. ACCA. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s determination in Erlinger v. United States that the existence of a prior offense is a jury question, and the requirements for safety-valve relief under the First Step Act  in Pulsifer v. United States.

Participants. Laurie Levenson, David W. Burcham Chair in Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School; Evan Lee, Emeritus Professor, UC Law, San Francisco; and Francesca Williams, Executive Education Attorney, Federal Judicial Center.


Tags:
Appeals | Certiorari | Bench Rulings | Civil Rights | Civil Rights Act of 1964 | Civil Rights Act of 1991 | Equal Protection | Constitutional Law | Bill of Rights | Due Process | Fifth Amendment | Fourteenth Amendment | Sixth Amendment | Criminal Justice | Criminal Litigation & Procedure | Apprendi | Armed Career Criminal Act | Evidence | Admission | Confrontation Clause | Cross Examination (611) | Judicial Notice | Prior Convictions (609) | Findings of Fact | Juries | Deliberation | Juror Bias | Juror Questions | Jury Impartiality | Jury Instructions | Jury Questionnaires | Jury Trials | Right to Jury Trial | Post Trial | Probation & Pretrial Services | Risk Assessment | Sentencing | Aggravating Factors | Departures | Fair Sentencing Act | Multiple Counts | Presentencing Report | Prior Criminal Record | Recidivism | Sentence Mitigation | Sentencing Reform Act | Variances | Supreme Court: The Term in Review | Term Talk

Subscribe to Term Talk