W.D. Tex.

Displaying 21 - 30 of 41, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

A New Party’s Qualification for the Ballot in Texas

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

April 5, 2023

Natural Law Party of Texas v. Bomer (James R. Nowlin, W.D. Tex. 1:00 cv 592)

Preclearance Required for a Special-Election Schedule Ordered by a State Court

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

March 14, 2023

LULAC of Texas v. Ramon (Alia Moses, Jerry E. Smith, and Xavier Rodriguez, W.D. Tex. 2:10-cv-58)

Case Commentary: Leon v. Ruiz No. MO:19-CV-00293-RCG, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43758 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2020)

James D. Garbolino

July 29, 2020

Defenses | General Denial

In this case, a father presented a prima facie case for the return of his child, but the mother waited until her opening statement at trial to present her affirmative defenses.

Holding

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Margaret S. Williams, Barbara Meierhoefer

February 6, 2020

In late 2017, the Committee on Defender Services (Committee) asked the Federal Judicial Center to generate a white paper on the potential effects on the federal courts and the defender services program of a determination that states have “opted in” to special expedited procedures created by the A

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

March 1, 2010

Appendix E-12: Western District of Texas — General Procedure Order

March 1, 2010

Appendix C-15: Western District of Texas — Order Denying Motions for Authorization of Expert Assistance and Leave to File Ex Parte Application Under Seal

March 1, 2010

Appendix G-6: Western District of Texas — Order Granting Motion for Stay and Abeyance

March 1, 2010

The Use of Courtrooms in U.S. District Courts: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration & Case Management

Carol L. Krafka, Donna J. Stienstra, Patricia A. Lombard, Rebecca N. Eyre

January 1, 2008

At the request of the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, the Federal Judicial Center conducted a study of the use of courtrooms in the U.S. district courts.

Court-Ordered Mental Examinations of Capital Defendants: Procedures in Ten States

Laural L. Hooper, Jennifer Evans, Robert Nida

March 26, 1999

Report to the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules regarding the proposal to amend Rule 12.2. Procedures governing court-ordered mental examinations are presented as they have been implemented in a sample of districts with extensive death penalty experience.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

W.D. Tex.

A New Party’s Qualification for the Ballot in Texas

Preclearance Required for a Special-Election Schedule Ordered by a State Court

Case Commentary: Leon v. Ruiz No. MO:19-CV-00293-RCG, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43758 (W.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2020)

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

Appendix E-12: Western District of Texas — General Procedure Order

Appendix C-15: Western District of Texas — Order Denying Motions for Authorization of Expert Assistance and Leave to File Ex Parte Application Under Seal

Appendix G-6: Western District of Texas — Order Granting Motion for Stay and Abeyance

The Use of Courtrooms in U.S. District Courts: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration & Case Management

Court-Ordered Mental Examinations of Capital Defendants: Procedures in Ten States

Pages