U.S. Courts of Appeals

Displaying 41 - 50 of 141, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Case Commentary: Grau v. Grau, 780 F. App’x 787 (11th Cir. 2019)

James D. Garbolino

November 1, 2019

Habitual Residence

Facts

Case Commentary: Fernandez v. Bailey, 909 F.3d 353 (11th Cir. 2018)

James D. Garbolino

January 18, 2019

Article 18 Discretion to Return Child | Settlement | Repeated Abductions

Case Commentary: Monzon v. De La Roca, 910 F.3d 92 (3d Cir. 2018)

James D. Garbolino

January 18, 2019

Commencement of Proceedings Defined | Article 12 Defense | Settlement

Case Commentary: Moreno v. Zank, 895 F.3d 917 (6th Cir. 2018)

James D. Garbolino

November 16, 2018

Habitual Residence

Case Commentary: Taglieri v. Monasky, 907 F.3d 404 (6th Cir. 2018)

James D. Garbolino

November 16, 2018

Habitual Residence | Infants

Case Commentary: Soto v. Contreras, 880 F.3d 706 (5th Cir. 2018)

James D. Garbolino

March 14, 2018

Domestic Violence | Grave Risk

Case Commentary: Marks v. Hochhauser, 876 F.3d 416 (2d Cir. 2017)

James D. Garbolino

March 9, 2018

Wrongful Retention | Single or Continuing Act | Date of Entry into Force

Case Commentary: Madrigal v. Tellez, 848 F.3d 669 (5th Cir. 2017)

James D. Garbolino

February 13, 2018

Return Orders | Enforcement | Place of Return

This case involves consideration of motions filed by both parents to modify and vacate the order of return. At the time of the hearing on the motions, the children had been returned to their habitual residence, Mexico.

Case Commentary: Ahmed v. Ahmed, 867 F.3d 682 (6th Cir. 2017)

James D. Garbolino

February 12, 2018

Habitual Residence | Especially Young Children | Infants

The Sixth Circuit expanded the habitual residence standard to allow consideration of shared parental intent in cases involving especially young children who lack sufficient capacity to acclimate to any residence.

Case Commentary: Padilla v. Troxell, 850 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 2017)

James D. Garbolino

February 12, 2018

Defenses | Consent – Facts Supporting Consent

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Case Commentary: Grau v. Grau, 780 F. App’x 787 (11th Cir. 2019)

Case Commentary: Fernandez v. Bailey, 909 F.3d 353 (11th Cir. 2018)

Case Commentary: Monzon v. De La Roca, 910 F.3d 92 (3d Cir. 2018)

Case Commentary: Moreno v. Zank, 895 F.3d 917 (6th Cir. 2018)

Case Commentary: Taglieri v. Monasky, 907 F.3d 404 (6th Cir. 2018)

Case Commentary: Soto v. Contreras, 880 F.3d 706 (5th Cir. 2018)

Case Commentary: Marks v. Hochhauser, 876 F.3d 416 (2d Cir. 2017)

Case Commentary: Madrigal v. Tellez, 848 F.3d 669 (5th Cir. 2017)

Case Commentary: Ahmed v. Ahmed, 867 F.3d 682 (6th Cir. 2017)

Case Commentary: Padilla v. Troxell, 850 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 2017)

Pages