N.D. Tex.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 46, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Summary Judgment for the Government

Brantley Starr

July 22, 2024

Opinion, Kovac v. Wray, No. 3:18-cv-110 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2023), D.E. 102, 660 F. Supp. 3d 555, aff'd, Opinion, No. 23-10284 (5th Cir. July 22, 2024), D.E. 79-1, 109 F.4th 331.

Emphasis Votes

Robert Timothy Reagan, Margaret S. Williams, Marie Leary, Catherine R. Borden, Jessica L. Snowden, Patricia D. Breen, Jason A. Cantone

October 10, 2023

Texas Democratic Party v. Dallas County (Jorge A. Solis, N.D. Tex. 3:08-cv-2117)

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Margaret S. Williams, Barbara Meierhoefer

February 6, 2020

In late 2017, the Committee on Defender Services (Committee) asked the Federal Judicial Center to generate a white paper on the potential effects on the federal courts and the defender services program of a determination that states have “opted in” to special expedited procedures created by the A

Patent Pilot Program: Five-Year Report

Margaret S. Williams, Rebecca N. Eyre, Joe S. Cecil

April 1, 2016

The Patent Pilot Program (PPP), a ten-year pilot program addressing the assignment of patent cases in certain U.S. district courts, was established on January 4, 2011, by Pub. L. No. 111-349.

Jurors’ and Attorneys’ Use of Social Media During Voir Dire, Trials, and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management

Meghan A. Dunn

January 1, 2014

This report summarizes the results of a Center survey of district court judges to assess the frequency with which jurors used social media to communicate during trials and deliberations in the past two years, and to identify strategies for curbing this behavior.

National Security Prosecutions: Jury Questionnaires and Preliminary Remarks to Prospective Jurors

March 1, 2011

Assembled here are jury questionnaires used by federal judges in criminal prosecutions in national security cases. Also included are prepared preliminary remarks for prospective jurors in some cases.

Appendix B-6: Northern District of Texas — Order Appointing Counsel

March 1, 2010

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

March 1, 2010

Appendix E-11: Northern District of Texas — General Procedure Order

March 1, 2010

Appendix H-7: Northern District of Texas — Order for Petitioner's Participation at Hearing via Video Teleconference

March 1, 2010

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

N.D. Tex.

Summary Judgment for the Government

Emphasis Votes

Opt-in: Potential Workload Implications for the Federal Judiciary

Patent Pilot Program: Five-Year Report

Jurors’ and Attorneys’ Use of Social Media During Voir Dire, Trials, and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management

National Security Prosecutions: Jury Questionnaires and Preliminary Remarks to Prospective Jurors

Appendix B-6: Northern District of Texas — Order Appointing Counsel

Appendix C-1: Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit — Special Procedures for Reviewing Attorney Compensation Requests in Death Penalty Cases

Appendix E-11: Northern District of Texas — General Procedure Order

Appendix H-7: Northern District of Texas — Order for Petitioner's Participation at Hearing via Video Teleconference

Pages