D. Md.

Displaying 11 - 20 of 20, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

CJA Supervising Attorney: A Possible Tool in Criminal Justice Act Administration

Tim Reagan, John E. Shapard, Christina Studebaker, Naomi Medvin, Jennifer Evans Marsh, Melissa Deckman Fallon, Stefanie A. Lindquist

April 1, 2001

The District of Maryland, the Central District of California, and the Northern District of California have each received special funds to create a position called “Criminal Justice Act Supervising Attorney” on a pilot basis.

Guidance to Advisory Groups Appointed Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 SY94 Statistics Supplement

October 1, 1994

Updated statistics for 44 districts with information for SY 1994

Report of the Advisory Group of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland Appointed Under the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (Draft)

George Beall, Civil Justice Advisory Group for the District of Maryland

February 16, 1993

A draft of the District of Maryland's Civil Justice Advisory Group Report, transmitted by the Advisory Group chairman, attorney George Beall.

FJC Directions, No. 1

Barbara Meierhoefer, Joe S. Cecil

April 1, 1991

A magazine that reported Center research and education activities in a concise format. In this issue of FJC Directions:

Letters: District of Maryland Judges and Magistrates Responses to Biden Bill

Clarence E. Goetz, J. Frederick Motz, Frederic N. Smalkin, Daniel E. Klein Jr., Deborah K. Chasanow, Catherine C. Blake

April 25, 1990

Letters composed by judges and magistrates in the District of Maryland and sent to Senator Joseph R. Biden and District of Maryland Senior Judge Frank A. Kaufman critiquing the Biden Bill

Memo: Judges' Responses to Biden Bill

Robert F. Peckham, Joseph Tyree Sneed III, James Anthony Redden, Owen Murphy Panner, Bob Packwood, Harold Barefoot Sanders Jr., William Docker Browning, Robert J. McNichols, Jay Carl Waldman, Justin L. Quackenbush, Martin Pence, John Francis Kilkenny, Albert Vickers Bryan Jr., James M. Ideman, John P. Vukasin Jr., Frank Albert Kaufman, Alexander Harvey II, J. Frederick Motz, Frederic N. Smalkin, John R. Kronenberg, John L. Weinberg

March 29, 1990

A collection of letters from judges sharing their opinions and responses to the Biden Bill. Collected and transmitted to the Judicial Conference subcommittee on the Biden Bill by Judge Robert F. Peckham

Letters: Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990. S. 2027 & H.R. 3898

Frederic N. Smalkin, Clarence E. Goetz, J. Frederick Motz

March 22, 1990

Correspondence regarding the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 from members of the District of Maryland

Summary Judgment Practice in Three District Courts

Joe S. Cecil, C. R. Douglas

January 1, 1987

A review of data indicating a decline in the percentage of cases disposed of by summary judgment from 1975 to 1986. The report also notes, however, a renewed interest in the use of this procedure, the standards for which have been clarified by several Supreme Court decisions.

Asbestos Case Management Conference Reading File, Volumes 1 and 2

Thomas E. Willging

June 7, 1984

Asbestos Case Management Orders.

District Court Implementation of Amended Federal Civil Rule 16: A Report on New Local Rules

Nancy A. Weeks

January 1, 1984

An examination of the local rules federal district courts have developed in response to the 1983 amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, which calls for increased use of scheduling orders in managing caseloads. An appendix contains sample local rules from fifteen districts.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here