Selected Developments in the History of Supreme Court Jurisdiction
|
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION |
||
|
Date |
Name/Citation |
Summary |
|
September 24, 1789 |
Judiciary Act of 1789 |
Exclusive jurisdiction over civil suits where a state is a party, except between a state and its citizens, citizens of another state, or aliens |
|
Original but not exclusive jurisdiction over civil suits between a state and citizens of another state or aliens |
||
|
Exclusive jurisdiction over suits against ambassadors, public ministers, and their domestics or domestic servants |
||
|
Original but not exclusive jurisdiction over suits brought by ambassadors and public ministers, or to which a consul or vice-consul is a party |
||
|
February 7, 1795 |
U.S. Constitution, Amendment XI |
Abolished jurisdiction over suits against a state by citizens of another state or by citizens or subjects of a foreign state |
|
March 3, 1890 |
Hans v. Louisiana |
Interpreted the Eleventh Amendment to bar suits against a state by its own citizens |
|
June 25, 1948 |
Judicial Code of 1948 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, replacing the provision for exclusive jurisdiction over civil suits where a state is a party with a provision for exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies between two or more states |
|
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for original but not exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies between the United States and a state |
||
|
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, replacing the provision for original but not exclusive jurisdiction over civil suits between a state and citizens of another state or aliens with a provision for original but not exclusive jurisdiction over all actions or proceedings by a state against citizens of another state or aliens |
||
|
September 30, 1978 |
Diplomatic Relations Act |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, eliminating exclusive jurisdiction over suits against ambassadors, public ministers, and their domestics or domestic servants, by providing for original but not exclusive jurisdiction over all actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice-consuls of foreign states are parties |
|
APPELLATE JURISDICTION |
||
|
From the Highest Court of a State |
||
|
Date |
Name/Citation |
Summary |
|
September 24, 1789 |
Judiciary Act of 1789 |
Writ of error in cases in which a treaty, statute, or authority exercised under the United States is ruled invalid |
|
Writ of error in cases in which a statute or authority exercised under any state is challenged as repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, and is ruled valid |
||
|
Writ of error in cases in which a decision is made against a title, right, privilege, or exemption claimed under the Constitution or a treaty, statute, or commission of the United States |
||
|
December 23, 1914 |
Judiciary Act of 1914 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for writ of certiorari in cases in which a treaty, statute, or authority exercised under the United States is ruled valid |
|
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for writ of certiorari in cases in which a statute or authority exercised under any state is challenged as repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and is ruled invalid |
||
|
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for writ of certiorari in cases in which a decision is made in favor of a title, right, privilege, or exemption claimed under the Constitution or a treaty, statute, commission, or authority of the United States |
||
|
September 6, 1916 |
Judiciary Act of 1916 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, converting from writ of error to writ of certiorari cases in which a decision is made against a title, right, privilege, or exemption claimed under the Constitution or a treaty, statute, commission, or authority of the United States |
|
February 17, 1922 |
42 Stat. 366 |
Added a provision for writ of error where a decision is made against a claim, brought before final judgment in the case, that a change in the rule of law or the construction of a statute applicable to a contract would violate the Constitution |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Added a provision for writ of certiorari in cases in which a treaty, statute, or authority exercised under the United States is ruled invalid [writ of error still available in such cases] |
|
Added a provision for writ of certiorari in cases in which a statute or authority exercised under any state is challenged as repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and is ruled valid [writ of error still available in such cases] |
||
|
January 31, 1928 |
45 Stat. 54 |
Abolished the writ of error and made all relief previously available by writ of error obtainable by appeal |
|
July 29, 1970 |
District of Columbia Court Reform and Criminal Procedure Act |
Defined the highest court of a state as including the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, established by the act |
|
June 27, 1988 |
Supreme Court Case Selections Act |
Abolished the right of appeal from state courts and made cases previously reviewable on appeal reviewable upon writ of certiorari |
|
|
||
|
From the U.S. Circuit Courts and U.S. District Courts |
||
|
September 24, 1789 |
Judiciary Act of 1789 |
Writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts in civil actions and suits in equity brought there originally, removed from a state court, or appealed from a U.S. district court where the matter in dispute exceeds $2,000 |
|
February 13, 1801 |
Judiciary Act of 1801 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, abolishing writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts in suits in equity |
|
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for appeal from the U.S. circuit courts in cases of equity, admiralty, maritime, and prize or no prize, where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 |
||
|
March 8, 1802 |
Repeal Act of 1802 |
Repealed the Judiciary Act of 1801 [thereby reverting to the provisions of the Judiciary Act of 1789] |
|
April 29, 1802 |
Judiciary Act of 1802 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for legal issues upon which the judges of a U.S. circuit court are divided to be certified to the Supreme Court for decision |
|
March 3, 1803 |
Judiciary Act of 1803 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1789, adding a provision for appeal from the U.S. circuit courts in cases of equity, admiralty, maritime, and prize or no prize, where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 [writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts in civil actions still available pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789] |
|
July 4, 1840 |
5 Stat. 393 |
Added a provision for writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts in all cases carried there by writ of error from the U.S. district courts [writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts in civil actions appealed there from the U.S. district courts still available pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789] |
|
March 3, 1863 |
Habeas Corpus Act of 1863 |
Added a provision for writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts from final judgment in any suit or prosecution (arising from an arrest, imprisonment, or other act done under the authority of the United States during the Civil War) brought in a state court and removed to a U.S. circuit court pursuant to the act |
|
June 30, 1864 |
13 Stat. 310 |
Amended the Judiciary Act of 1803, providing for direct appeal to the Supreme Court from a U.S. district court in prize cases where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 or the district judge has certified that the case involves a question of general importance |
|
Prize causes pending in the U.S. circuit courts may be transferred to the Supreme Court upon the application of all parties in interest where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 or the district judge has certified that the case involves a question of general importance |
||
| April 9, 1866 | Civil Rights Act of 1866 14 Stat. 29 |
Provided for appeal on any question of law in cases arising under the act. |
|
January 25, 1869 |
The Alicia |
Ruled the provision of the 1864 statute allowing the transfer of prize cases from the U.S. circuit courts to the Supreme Court unconstitutional in cases where no decree has been entered, on the grounds that the Supreme Court may exercise only appellate jurisdiction in prize cases |
|
June 1, 1872 |
Practice Conformity Act |
Added a provision for appeal from the U.S. circuit courts where, after final judgment, the judges have certified their disagreement with one another on a legal issue which could have been reviewed before judgment on a certificate of division of opinion pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1802 |
|
February 16, 1875 |
18 Stat. 315 |
Appeal from the U.S. circuit courts in admiralty and maritime cases extends only to questions of law and rulings of the court, and not to issues of fact decided by the jury |
|
Amended all applicable statutes, raising the matter in controversy requirement for Supreme Court review from $2,000 to $5,000 |
||
|
March 3, 1875 |
Jurisdiction and Removal Act |
Added a provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of an order of a U.S. circuit court disposing of a case by dismissal or remand to state court on the basis of a lack of federal jurisdiction or the fraudulent joinder of parties |
|
February 4, 1887 |
Interstate Commerce Act |
Added a provision for appeal from the U.S. circuit courts in suits brought by the Interstate Commerce Commission, or any interested company or person, to enforce orders of the Commission where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 |
|
February 6, 1889 |
25 Stat. 656 |
Added a provision for writ of error to any court of the United States in a case of conviction of a crime for which the punishment is death |
|
February 25, 1889 |
25 Stat. 693 |
Added a provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. circuit courts where the jurisdiction of the court is in question, but in cases where the matter in controversy does not exceed $5,000, only the question of jurisdiction shall be reviewed |
|
March 3, 1891 |
Circuit Court of Appeals Act (Evarts Act) |
Repealed the portion of the act of February 16, 1875, raising the matter in controversy requirement for Supreme Court review, where applicable, from $2,000 to $5,000 |
|
Amended existing statutes providing for writ of error to the U.S. circuit courts in civil cases by providing for review, by appeal or writ of error, of the following cases in the U.S. circuit courts: |
||
|
Cases in which the jurisdiction of the court is in issue; the question of jurisdiction alone shall be certified to the Supreme Court for decision |
||
|
Final sentences and decrees in prize causes |
||
|
Cases of conviction of a capital or other infamous crime |
||
|
Cases involving the construction or application of the Constitution |
||
|
Cases in which the constitutionality of a federal law, or the validity or construction of a treaty, are at issue |
||
|
Cases in which the constitution or law of a state is alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution |
||
|
January 20, 1897 |
29 Stat. 492 |
Amended the Evarts Act of 1891, repealing the provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of convictions in the U.S. circuit courts of infamous crimes not capital |
|
March 3, 1899 |
Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act |
Added a provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of criminal cases in the U.S. district and U.S. circuit courts brought under the act for obstruction of navigable waterways |
|
February 11, 1903 |
Expediting Act |
In any suit in equity brought by the United States under the Sherman Act of 1890, the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, or future acts with a similar purpose, if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public importance, the case shall be expedited and heard by a three-judge U.S. circuit court, and the circuit judges, if divided in opinion, shall certify the case to the Supreme Court for review |
|
In every suit in equity brought by the United States under the above-mentioned acts, appeal from a final judgment of a U.S. circuit court shall be only to the Supreme Court |
||
|
February 19, 1903 |
Elkins Act |
Applied the Expediting Act of 1903 to all suits brought under the act at the direction of the Attorney General in the name of the Interstate Commerce Commission |
|
June 29, 1906 |
Hepburn Act |
Amended the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, eliminating the $2,000 matter in controversy requirement for appeals from the U.S. circuit courts in cases brought to enforce orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission |
|
Applied the Expediting Act of 1903 to all suits against the Commission to enjoin, set aside, annul, or suspend an order, as well as to any proceedings in equity to enforce an order of the Commission or a provision of the Interstate Commerce Act; required the Attorney General, in all such suits, to file the certificate provided for in the Expediting Act |
||
|
March 2, 1907 |
Criminal Appeals Act |
Added a provision for writ of error to the U.S. circuit and U.S. district courts, on behalf of the United States, in criminal cases, in the following instances: |
|
A decision quashing an indictment based on the invalidity or construction of the statute on which it is based |
||
|
A decision arresting a judgment of conviction for insufficiency of the indictment based on the invalidity or construction of the statute on which it is based |
||
|
A decision sustaining a special plea in bar when the defendant has not been put in jeopardy |
||
|
June 18, 1910 |
Commerce Court Act |
Established the Commerce Court and transferred jurisdiction to it over suits to enforce orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission and suits to enjoin, set aside, annul or suspend such orders [the provisions of the Expediting Act of 1903 remained in effect, where applicable, for suits in equity brought by the United States under the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887] |
|
June 18, 1910 |
Three-Judge Court Act |
Added a provision for three-judge courts to hear suits for injunctions restraining state officers from enforcing state statutes alleged to be unconstitutional, and for appeal to the Supreme Court from an order of such a three-judge court granting or denying an interlocutory injunction |
|
June 25, 1910 |
36 Stat. 854 |
Repealed the portion of the Expediting Act of 1903 providing for certification of a case to the Supreme Court where the circuit judges are divided in opinion |
|
March 3, 1911 |
Judicial Code of 1911 |
Abolished the U.S. circuit courts effective January 1, 1912, transferring their jurisdiction to the U.S. district courts |
|
Repealed the provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of convictions in the U.S. district courts for capital crimes |
||
|
March 4, 1913 |
37 Stat. 1013 |
Amended the Three-Judge Court Act of 1910 to include suits for injunctions restraining state officers from enforcing orders of a state administrative board or commission alleged to be unconstitutional |
|
October 22, 1913 |
Urgent Deficiencies Act |
Abolished the Commerce Court, transferred its jurisdiction to the U.S. district courts, and provided for three-judge U.S. district courts to hear suits for injunctions restraining the enforcement of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission |
|
Provided for direct appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying an interlocutory injunction restraining the enforcement of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission as well as from a final judgement in any suit brought under the act |
||
|
September 7, 1916 |
Shipping Act |
Provided that procedures in suits to enforce, suspend, or set aside orders of the U.S. Shipping Board, created by the act, would be the same as those in similar suits regarding orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission [see Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913] |
|
June 10, 1920 |
Federal Power Act |
Provided that the enforcement power of the Federal Power Commission, created by the act, would be governed by the same procedures as provided in the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, and that companies subject to regulation would have the same rights of hearing, defense, and review as in cases brought under that act [see Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913] |
|
August 15, 1921 |
Packers and Stockyards Act |
Provided that the jurisdiction, powers and duties of the Secretary of Agriculture in enforcing the act would be subject to the same laws applicable to suspending or restraining orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission [see Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913] |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Provided for direct review of interlocutory orders and final judgments of the U.S. district courts pursuant to the relevant provisions of the following five statutes, and no others: |
|
The Expediting Act of 1903 |
||
|
The Criminal Appeals Act of 1907 |
||
|
The Three-Judge Court Act of 1910, as amended by the act of March 4, 1913 [the 1925 act further amended this act to provide for appeal from the grant or denial of a permanent injunction] |
||
|
The Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913 |
||
|
The Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921 |
||
|
[Although not listed in the 1925 act, the direct review provisions of the Shipping Act of 1916 and the Federal Power Act of 1920 remained in effect] |
||
|
January 31, 1928 |
45 Stat. 54 |
Abolished the writ of error and made all relief previously available by writ of error obtainable by appeal |
|
June 10, 1930 |
Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act |
Provided that the orders of the Secretary of Agriculture in enforcing the act would be subject to the same laws governing the suspension or restraining of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission [see Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913] |
|
June 19, 1934 |
Communications Act |
Provided that the Expediting Act of 1903 would apply to suits in equity brought by the United States under the act |
|
Provided that suits to enforce, enjoin, set aside, annul or suspend orders of the Federal Communications Commission, created by the act, would be subject to the laws regarding enforcing or setting aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission [see Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913] |
||
|
August 26, 1935 |
49 Stat. 860 |
Amended the Federal Power Act of 1920 to provide for review of orders of the Federal Power Commission in the U.S. courts of appeals, thereby eliminating the provisions for three-judge U.S. district courts and direct appeal to the Supreme Court in such cases |
|
May 21, 1936 |
49 Stat. 1369 |
Authorized appeal to the Supreme Court of orders and decrees of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington in U.S. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co., et al |
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Added a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional |
|
Added a provision for three-judge U.S. district courts to hear suits to enjoin the enforcement of an act of Congress on the grounds that it is unconstitutional, and provided for appeal to the Supreme Court from an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction |
||
|
June 25, 1948 |
Judicial Code of 1948 |
Provided for direct appeal to Supreme Court from a U.S. district court in any case required to be heard by a three-judge court |
|
Amended the direct appeal provision of the Expediting Act of 1903 by replacing “suit in equity” with “civil action” [the three-judge court provision of the act was so amended in 1942] |
||
|
Repealed the provision for direct appeal to Supreme Court from U.S. district courts in criminal cases brought under the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 [this provision was deemed implicitly repealed by the act of 1925, which did not include it among the provisions for direct review from the U.S. district courts] |
||
|
December 29, 1950 |
Administrative Orders Review Act |
Provided for review in the U.S. courts of appeals of administrative orders under the Shipping Act of 1916, as amended by the Intercoastal Shipping Act of 1933, the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, and the Communications Act of 1934, thereby eliminating the provisions for three-judge U.S. district courts and direct appeal to the Supreme Court in such cases [the act made no change to the provisions of the Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913 regarding orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission] |
| July 2, 1964 | Civil Rights Act of 1964 | Provided for certain cases brought under the act by the Attorney General to be heard by three-judge district courts with direct appeal to the Supreme Court. |
| August 6, 1965 | Voting Rights Act of 1965 | Provided for certain cases brought under the act by the Attorney General or by a state or political subdivision seeking a declaratory judgment to be heard by three-judge district courts with direct appeal to the Supreme Court. |
|
January 2, 1971 |
Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1970 |
Repealed the provision of the Criminal Appeals Act of 1907 for direct appeal to Supreme Court from the U.S. district courts in certain criminal cases |
|
December 21, 1974 |
Antitrust Procedures and Penalty Act |
Amended the Expediting Act of 1903 as follows: |
|
Eliminated the act’s applicability to suits brought under the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 [limiting the act to cases brought under the Sherman Act of 1890 and other acts of a similar purpose] |
||
|
Repealed the provision for three-judge U.S. district courts |
||
|
Limited direct appeal to the Supreme Court to cases where the district judge certifies that immediate review is of general public importance in the administration of justice |
||
|
January 2, 1975 |
88 Stat. 1918 |
Repealed the provisions of the Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913 for three-judge U.S. district courts and direct appeal to the Supreme Court in suits challenging orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission |
|
August 12, 1976 |
90 Stat. 1119 |
Repealed the provisions of the Three-Judge Court Act of 1910, as amended, and the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937, as amended, for three-judge U.S. district courts in suits for injunctions against enforcement of a state statute or an act of Congress, respectively |
|
Provided for three-judge U.S. district courts in suits challenging the constitutionality of an apportionment of congressional districts or of any statewide legislative body |
||
|
June 27, 1988 |
Supreme Court Case Selections Act |
Repealed the provision of the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937 for direct appeal in cases where an act of Congress is held unconstitutional |
|
|
|
|
|
From the U.S. Courts of Appeals |
||
|
March 3, 1891 |
Circuit Court of Appeals Act (Evarts Act) |
In cases based on diversity of citizenship, patent laws, revenue laws, criminal laws, or admiralty, the judgments of the U.S. courts of appeals, created by the act, are final; subject to the following provisions: |
|
The courts of appeals may certify legal questions to the Supreme Court upon which the Supreme Court may issue instructions or require that the entire controversy be sent up for its review and decision |
||
|
In the same categories of cases, the Supreme Court may issue a writ of certiorari requiring the case to be sent up for its review and decision |
||
|
In all cases not hereinbefore made final in a U.S. court of appeals, there shall be a right of review in the Supreme Court, by appeal or writ of error, where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
||
|
March 3, 1911 |
Judicial Code of 1911 |
Amended the Circuit Court of Appeals Act of 1891 by adding copyright cases to those made final in the U.S. courts of appeals |
|
September 6, 1916 |
Judiciary Act of 1916 |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. courts of appeals brought under the Railroad Safety Appliance Act of 1893, the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, the Hours of Service Act of 1907, and the Federal Employers’ Liability Act of 1908, making such cases reviewable only upon a writ of certiorari |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Amended the provisions for review by the Supreme Court of cases in the U.S. courts of appeals by providing as follows: |
|
In any case, civil or criminal, a U.S. court of appeals may certify a question of law to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court may give binding instructions on the question or require the entire matter to be sent up for its review |
||
|
In any case, civil or criminal, the Supreme Court may issue a writ of certiorari to a U.S. court of appeals either before or after judgment in such court |
||
|
In any case where a state statute is held to be repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, the party relying on such statute shall be entitled to review in the Supreme Court by appeal or writ of error |
||
|
No review by the Supreme Court of a judgment or decree of a U.S. court of appeals shall be had other than as provided by this statute |
||
|
January 31, 1928 |
45 Stat. 54 |
Abolished the writ of error and made all relief previously available by writ of error obtainable by appeal |
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Added a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional |
|
June 27, 1988 |
Supreme Court Case Selections Act |
Repealed the portion of the Judiciary Act of 1925 providing for appeal in a case where a state statute is held to be repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States |
|
Repealed the portion of the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937 providing for appeal in cases where an act of Congress is held unconstitutional |
||
|
|
||
|
In Bankruptcy Cases |
||
|
March 2, 1867 |
Bankruptcy Act of 1867 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of bankruptcy cases in the U.S. circuit courts where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 |
|
June 7, 1878 |
20 Stat. 99 |
Repealed the Bankruptcy Act of 1867 |
|
July 1, 1898 |
Bankruptcy Act of 1898 (Nelson Act) |
Vested the Supreme Court with appellate jurisdiction over bankruptcy cases in courts not within any organized circuit and in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia |
|
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of bankruptcy cases in the U.S. courts of appeals where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 and the question is one which could have been taken from the highest court of a state to the Supreme Court |
||
|
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of bankruptcy cases in the U.S. courts of appeals where a justice of the Supreme Court certifies that the determination of the question involved is essential to a uniform construction of the bankruptcy act |
||
|
Controversies in bankruptcy cases in other federal courts may be certified to the Supreme Court |
||
|
The Supreme Court may issue writs of certiorari to other federal courts in bankruptcy cases |
||
|
September 6, 1916 |
Judiciary Act of 1916 |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. courts of appeals brought under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, making review in such cases available only upon a writ of certiorari |
|
June 22, 1938 |
Bankruptcy Act of 1938 (Chandler Act) |
Limited Supreme Court review of bankruptcy cases to judgements, decrees, and orders of the U.S. courts of appeals in accordance with the provisions of U.S. law now in force or hereinafter enacted |
|
|
||
|
From the Commerce Court |
||
|
June 18, 1910 |
Commerce Court Act |
Appeal from a final decree or judgment of the Commerce Court, created by the act |
|
Appeal from an interlocutory order granting or continuing an injunction restraining enforcement of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission |
||
|
October 22, 1913 |
Urgent Deficiencies Act |
Abolished the Commerce Court, effective December 31, 1913, and transferred its jurisdiction to the U.S. district courts |
|
|
||
|
From the Court of Claims |
||
|
March 3, 1863 |
Court of Claims Act of 1863 |
Appeal by either party where the matter in controversy exceeds $3,000 |
|
Appeal by the United States in cases where the presiding judge certifies that a judgment or decree will affect a class of cases, furnish a precedent for the action of an executive department of the government with respect to a class of cases, or establish a precedent on a constitutional question |
||
|
Appeal on questions of law by plaintiffs who have forfeited their judgments to the United States upon a finding by the Court of Claims that they have committed fraud |
||
|
March 9, 1865 |
Gordon v. U.S. |
Rejected Supreme Court jurisdiction over appeals from the Court of Claims on the grounds that the court’s judgments were subject to review by the Secretary of the Treasury and therefore not final and enforceable |
|
March 17, 1866 |
14 Stat. 9 |
Repealed the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to revise Court of Claims judgments and provided for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases previously decided under the 1863 act |
|
June 25, 1868 |
15 Stat. 75 |
Provided for appeal of all Court of Claims judgments adverse to the United States, eliminating previous jurisdictional requirements for such appeals |
|
July 12, 1870 |
16 Stat. 235 |
Repealed the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over cases in which a successful claimant had received a presidential pardon arising from the Civil War, and provided that all such suits be dismissed |
|
January 9, 1872 |
U.S. v. Klein |
Struck down as unconstitutional the portion of the 1870 statute repealing the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction in certain cases |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
The Court of Claims may certify questions of law to the Supreme Court to obtain instructions for the proper disposition of the case |
|
The Supreme Court may issue a writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims in any case |
||
|
No review by the Supreme Court of a judgment or decree of the Court of Claims shall be had other than as provided by this statute |
||
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Added a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional |
|
April 2, 1982 |
Federal Courts Improvement Act |
Abolished the Court of Claims |
|
|
||
|
From the Court of Private Land Claims |
||
|
March 3, 1891 |
Court of Private Land Claims Act |
Appeal by the United States or a claimant from a final judgment of the Court of Private Land Claims, created by the act [the court was terminated in 1904] |
|
|
||
|
From the Courts of the District of Columbia |
||
|
February 27, 1801 |
District of Columbia Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia where the matter in controversy exceeds $100 |
|
April 2, 1816 |
3 Stat. 261 |
Amended the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1801 by raising the matter in controversy requirement for review of cases in the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia to $1,000 |
|
Added a provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, where the matter in controversy exceeds $100 and is less than $1,000, where a justice of the Supreme Court has granted the petition of a party on the grounds that the case involves questions of law of such extensive interest and operation as to render final decision by the Supreme Court desirable |
||
|
March 3, 1863 |
12 Stat. 763, 764 |
Established the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia and abolished the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia |
|
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, as was provided by law with respect to the Circuit Court of the District of Columbia |
||
|
March 3, 1885 |
23 Stat. 443 |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia where the matter in controversy does not exceed $5,000; but the matter in controversy requirement shall not apply to cases involving the validity of a patent or copyright, or the validity of a treaty, statute, or authority exercised under the United States |
|
February 9, 1893 |
27 Stat. 434, 436 |
Established the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, which subsumed the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia |
|
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, as was provided by law with respect to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia |
||
|
March 3, 1897 |
29 Stat. 692 |
The Supreme Court may issue writs of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, as it may to the U.S. courts of appeals |
|
March 3, 1911 |
Judicial Code of 1911 |
Amended the act of February 9, 1893, by providing for review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia as follows: |
|
Cases in which the jurisdiction of the trial court is in issue; if the case as a whole is not otherwise reviewable, only the question of jurisdiction shall be certified to the Supreme Court |
||
|
Prize cases |
||
|
Cases involving the construction or application of the Constitution, the constitutionality of a federal law, or the validity or construction of a treaty |
||
|
Cases in which the constitution or law of a state is alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution |
||
|
Cases in which the validity of an authority exercised under the United States, or the existence or scope of any power or duty of an officer of the United States, is challenged |
||
|
Cases in which the construction of a federal law is drawn in question by the defendant |
||
|
Review by writ of certiorari, or upon the certification of a legal question by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, in cases arising under the patent laws, the copyright laws, the revenue laws, the criminal laws, and in admiralty cases |
||
|
April 27, 1912 |
37 Stat. 94 |
Appeal from a final decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia in cases regarding certain land claims |
|
March 4, 1913 |
District of Columbia Public Utility Act |
Appeal from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in proceedings challenging orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia |
|
April 9, 1923 |
Keller v. Potomac Electric Co. |
Held the jurisdiction conferred upon the Supreme Court by the District of Columbia Public Utility Act unconstitutional because it constituted a grant of legislative, rather than judicial, power |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Amended the provisions for review by the Supreme Court of cases in the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia by providing as follows: |
|
In any case, civil or criminal, the court may certify a question of law to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court may give binding instructions on the question or require the entire matter to be sent up for its review |
||
|
In any case, civil or criminal, the Supreme Court may issue a writ of certiorari to the court either before or after judgment in such court |
||
|
In any case where a state statute is held to be repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, the party relying on such statute shall be entitled to review in the Supreme Court by appeal or writ of error |
||
|
No review by the Supreme Court of a judgment or decree of the court shall be had other than as provided by this statute |
||
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Added a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional [included cases in both the District Court of the U.S. for the District of Columbia and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia] |
|
June 7, 1943 |
U.S. v. Belt |
Held that the act of 1912 conferring appellate jurisdiction on the Supreme Court in certain land cases had been implicitly repealed by the Judiciary Act of 1925, which provided for direct appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia exclusively in five instances, but did not include the 1912 statute |
|
June 25, 1948 |
Judicial Code of 1948 |
Made the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia equivalent to the U.S. district courts and U.S. courts of appeals, respectively |
|
|
||
|
From the Emergency Court of Appeals |
||
|
January 30, 1942 |
Emergency Price Control Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of cases brought under the act |
|
September 8, 1950 |
Defense Production Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of cases brought under the act |
|
March 19, 1962 |
Order of Chief Judge Albert B. Maris |
Abolished the Emergency Court of Appeals, effective April 18, 1962 |
|
|
||
|
In Habeas Corpus Proceedings |
||
|
September 24, 1789 |
Judiciary Act of 1789 |
Justices of the Supreme Court may issue writs of habeas corpus; the writ does not extend to prisoners in jail unless they are in custody under the authority of the United States, committed for trial before a federal court, or needed to testify in court |
|
August 29, 1842 |
5 Stat. 539 |
Appeal from the U.S. circuit courts in habeas corpus proceedings where a citizen or subject of a foreign state is denied release from confinement for an act done under the alleged authority of such foreign state |
|
February 5, 1867 |
Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 |
Appeal from a final judgment of a U.S. circuit court in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the petitioner alleges that their detention violates the Constitution or federal law |
|
March 27, 1868 |
15 Stat. 44 |
Repealed the portion of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 providing for appeal to the Supreme Court |
|
October 25, 1869 |
Ex parte Yerger |
Ruled the Supreme Court retained appellate jurisdiction over habeas corpus cases in the U.S. circuit courts pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789, notwithstanding the repeal of its appellate jurisdiction in cases brought under the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 |
|
March 3, 1885 |
23 Stat. 437 |
Restored the portion of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867 providing for appeal to the Supreme Court |
|
March 10, 1908 |
35 Stat. 40 |
Limited appeals from federal court, where the detention complained of is by virtue of process issued by a state court, to cases in which the federal court or a justice of the Supreme Court certifies that probable cause for an appeal exists |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Limited review of habeas corpus cases to those where a U.S. court of appeals certifies a question of law to the Supreme Court, or the Supreme Court issues a writ of certiorari to a U.S. court of appeals |
|
|
||
|
From the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals |
||
|
December 22, 1971 |
Economic Stabilization Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of cases brought under the act |
|
November 27, 1973 |
Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of cases brought under the act |
|
December 22, 1974 |
Energy Policy and Conservation Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of cases brought under the act |
|
October 29, 1992 |
Federal Courts Administration Act |
Abolished the Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, effective April 30, 1993 |
|
|
||
|
From the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (formerly U.S. Court of Military Appeals) |
||
|
December 6, 1983 |
Military Justice Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of the following cases: |
|
Cases reviewed by the Court of Military Appeals in which a Court of Military Review has affirmed a sentence affecting a general or flag officer or extending to death |
||
|
Cases certified to the Court of Military Appeals by the Judge Advocate General after review by a Court of Military Review |
||
|
Cases in which the Court of Military Appeals granted a petition for review after review by a Court of Military Review and a showing of good cause by the accused |
||
|
Cases other than those previously described in which the Court of Military Appeals granted relief |
||
|
|
||
|
From the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals (originally U.S. Court of Customs Appeals) |
||
|
August 22, 1914 |
38 Stat. 703 |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of cases in which the construction of the Constitution or a treaty is at issue, or where the Attorney General has, before a decision is rendered, certified that the case is of such importance as to justify review by the Supreme Court |
|
June 17, 1930 |
Tariff Act |
Review, by writ of certiorari, of all cases |
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Added a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional |
|
April 2, 1982 |
Federal Courts Improvement Act |
Abolished the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals |
|
|
||
|
From the U.S. Court of International Trade |
||
|
October 10, 1980 |
Customs Courts Act |
Reorganized the U.S. Customs Court as the U.S. Court of International Trade, thereby making the U.S. Court of International Trade subject to the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937, which provided for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional |
|
June 27, 1988 |
Supreme Court Case Selections Act |
Repealed the provision of the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937 for appeal in cases where an act of Congress is held unconstitutional |
|
|
||
|
From the U.S. Customs Court |
||
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Provided for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional |
|
October 10, 1980 |
Customs Courts Act |
Reorganized the U.S. Customs Court as the U.S. Court of International Trade |
|
|
||
|
From the U.S. Territorial Courts |
||
|
General Provisions |
||
|
March 3, 1805 |
2 Stat. 338 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases concerning the United States in the superior courts of the territories in which no district court has been established [those courts having been vested with jurisdiction over such cases equal to that of the district court in Kentucky] |
|
April 7, 1874 |
Territorial Practice Act |
The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over the territorial courts shall be exercised by writ of error where the trial was by jury and by appeal in all other cases |
|
March 3, 1885 |
23 Stat. 443 |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme courts of the territories where the matter in controversy does not exceed $5,000; but the matter in controversy requirement shall not apply to cases involving the validity of a patent or copyright, or the validity of a treaty, statute, or authority exercised under the United States |
|
March 3, 1891 |
Circuit Court of Appeals Act (Evarts Act) |
The statute made the decisions of the newly-created U.S. courts of appeals final (subject to certification to the Supreme Court of a question of law or the issuance by the Supreme Court of a writ of certiorari) in diversity of citizenship cases as well as cases based on patent, revenue, criminal, or admiralty laws, thereby precluding direct appeal from a territorial court to the Supreme Court in such cases |
|
August 24, 1937 |
Judiciary Reform Act |
Added a provision for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases to which the United States or a federal agency, officer, or employee is a party and in which an act of Congress has been ruled unconstitutional [included cases in all courts of record for Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico] |
|
June 25, 1948 |
Judicial Code of 1948 |
Amended the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937 to include the District Court for the Territory of Alaska, the U.S. District Court for the District of the Canal Zone, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands |
|
October 31, 1951 |
65 Stat. 726 |
Amended the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937 to include the District Court of Guam [the Organic Act of Guam, August 1, 1950, 64 Stat. 390, had enacted an equivalent provision] |
|
June 27, 1988 |
Supreme Court Case Selections Act |
Repealed the portion of the Judiciary Reform Act of 1937 providing for appeal to the Supreme Court in cases where an act of Congress is held unconstitutional |
|
|
||
|
Alabama Territory |
||
|
April 20, 1818 |
3 Stat. 468 |
Appeal from the general court of Alabama Territory in admiralty and maritime cases |
|
|
||
|
Alaska Territory (originally District of Alaska) |
||
|
May 17, 1884 |
First Organic Act for Alaska |
Review of cases in the district court for Alaska as in other cases from the U.S. district courts |
|
July 8, 1898 |
30 Stat. 728 |
Transferred to the Supreme Court cases originating in the district court for Alaska that were pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on or prior to December 30, 1897, where the Supreme Court would have had jurisdiction when the case was appealed |
|
June 6, 1900 |
Second Organic Act for Alaska |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska Territory, as follows: |
|
Prize causes |
||
|
Cases involving the construction or application of the Constitution |
||
|
Cases in which the constitutionality of a federal law or the validity or construction of a treaty is in question |
||
|
Cases in which a state constitutional provision or law is alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution |
||
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska Territory |
|
|
||
|
Arizona Territory |
||
|
February 24, 1863 |
Arizona Territory Organic Act |
Extended to Arizona Territory laws applicable to New Mexico Territory [see New Mexico Territory, below] |
|
|
||
|
Arkansas Territory |
||
|
May 26, 1824 |
4 Stat. 53 |
Appeal from the superior court of Arkansas Territory in certain land cases |
|
|
||
|
Colorado Territory |
||
|
February 28, 1861 |
Colorado Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Colorado Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
Dakota Territory |
||
|
March 2, 1861 |
Dakota Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Dakota Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
Florida Territory (including East and West Florida Territories) |
||
|
March 3, 1823 |
3 Stat. 752 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the superior courts of the territories of East and West Florida where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
May 15, 1826 |
4 Stat. 165 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the court of appeals of Florida Territory in several categories, including suits to which the United States is a party and suits arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States |
|
|
||
|
Hawaii Territory |
||
|
March 3, 1909 |
35 Stat. 839 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the district court for the Territory of Hawaii as are so reviewable from the U.S. district and U.S. circuit courts |
|
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of the Territory of Hawaii where the matter in controversy exceeds $5,000 |
||
|
March 3, 1911 |
Judicial Code of 1911 |
Added a provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of the Territory of Hawaii where such review could be had from the highest court of a state |
|
January 28, 1915 |
38 Stat. 804 |
Repealed the provision for review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of the Territory of Hawaii where the matter in controversy exceeds $5,000 |
|
Added a provision for review, by writ of certiorari to the supreme court of the Territory of Hawaii, of all cases other than those in which review by appeal or writ of error is available |
||
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. District Court for the Territory of Hawaii |
|
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of the Territory of Hawaii |
||
|
June 25, 1948 |
Judicial Code of 1948 |
Included the U.S. District Court for the Territory of Hawaii within the general definition of the U.S. district courts, thereby including it within the provisions for direct review by the Supreme Court applicable to all U.S. district courts under the Judicial Code of 1948 |
|
|
||
|
Idaho Territory |
||
|
March 3, 1863 |
Idaho Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Idaho Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000, except that appeal or writ of error will be allowed from a decision of the territorial supreme court or district courts, or any judge thereof, on a petition for habeas corpus |
|
|
||
|
Indian Territory |
||
|
March 1, 1889 |
25 Stat. 784 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. Court for the Indian Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
March 3, 1891 |
Circuit Court of Appeals Act (Evarts Act) |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. Court for the Indian Territory under the same regulations as apply to the U.S. district courts and U.S. circuit courts under the act |
|
|
||
|
Iowa Territory |
||
|
June 12, 1838 |
Iowa Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Iowa Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
Kansas Territory |
||
|
May 30, 1854 |
Kansas-Nebraska Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Kansas Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000, except that the matter in controversy requirement shall not apply to matters involving title to slaves and that appeal or writ of error will be allowed from a decision of the territorial supreme court or district courts, or any judge thereof, on a petition for habeas corpus |
|
|
||
|
Michigan Territory |
||
|
February 5, 1825 |
4 Stat. 81 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the highest court of Michigan Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
Minnesota Territory |
||
|
March 3, 1849 |
Minnesota Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Minnesota Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
Montana Territory |
||
|
May 26, 1864 |
Montana Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Montana Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000, except that appeal or writ of error will be allowed from a decision of the territorial supreme court or district courts, or any judge thereof, on a petition for habeas corpus |
|
|
||
|
Nebraska Territory |
||
|
May 30, 1854 |
Kansas-Nebraska Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Nebraska Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000, except that the matter in controversy requirement shall not apply to matters involving title to slaves and that appeal or writ of error will be allowed from a decision of the territorial supreme court or district courts, or any judge thereof, on a petition for habeas corpus |
|
|
||
|
Nevada Territory |
||
|
March 2, 1861 |
Nevada Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Nevada Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
New Mexico Territory |
||
|
September 9, 1850 |
New Mexico Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of New Mexico Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000, except that the matter in controversy requirement shall not apply to matters involving title to slaves and that appeal or writ of error will be allowed from a decision of the territorial supreme court or district courts, or any judge thereof, on a petition for habeas corpus |
|
|
||
|
Oklahoma Territory |
||
|
May 2, 1890 |
Oklahoma Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Oklahoma Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $5,000 |
|
|
||
|
Oregon Territory |
||
|
August 14, 1848 |
Oregon Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Oregon Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 and in cases where the Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty is brought into question |
|
|
||
|
Orleans Territory |
||
|
March 26, 1804 |
Territory of Orleans Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of Orleans [the statute vested the court with the same jurisdiction and powers as the district court in Kentucky, giving the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction by implication] |
|
|
||
|
Philippines |
||
|
July 1, 1902 |
Philippine Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Supreme Court of the Philippines, as follows: |
|
Cases where the Constitution or any statute, treaty, title, right or privilege of the United States is involved |
||
|
Cases where the matter in controversy exceeds $25,000 |
||
|
Cases where the title or possession of real estate exceeding $25,000 in value is in question |
||
|
September 6, 1916 |
Judiciary Act of 1916 |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the Supreme Court of the Philippines after November 5, 1916; provided for review, by writ of certiorari, in cases where review was previously allowed by appeal or writ of error |
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Removed cases where a “title, right or privilege of the United States” is involved from those in which a writ of certiorari may be issued to the Supreme Court of the Philippines |
|
July 4, 1946 |
Treaty of Manila |
The United States relinquished sovereignty over the Philippines, ending the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction over the Supreme Court of the Philippines |
|
|
||
|
Puerto Rico |
||
|
April 12, 1900 |
Organic Act for Puerto Rico (Foraker Act) |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Puerto Rico and the U.S. District Court for Puerto Rico where such review is available from the territorial supreme courts and where the Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty is brought in question and the right claimed thereunder is denied |
|
March 3, 1911 |
Judicial Code of 1911 |
Amended the Organic Act for Puerto Rico of 1900 by providing for review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Puerto Rico and the U.S. District Court for Puerto Rico, as follows: |
|
Cases involving the validity of a copyright |
||
|
Cases involving the validity of a treaty, statute, or authority exercised under the United States |
||
|
Cases in which the Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty is brought in question and the right claimed thereunder is denied |
||
|
All other cases in which the matter in controversy exceeds $5,000 |
||
|
January 28, 1915 |
38 Stat. 804 |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. District Court for Puerto Rico as are so reviewable in the U.S. district courts |
|
Repealed previous provisions for review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Puerto Rico and provided for such review as is available in cases in the highest courts of the states |
||
|
Added a provision for review, by writ of certiorari to the supreme court of Puerto Rico, in all cases other than those in which review by appeal or writ of error is available |
||
|
February 13, 1925 |
Judiciary Act of 1925 (Judges’ Bill) |
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the U.S. District Court for Puerto Rico |
|
Abolished review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Puerto Rico |
||
|
June 25, 1948 |
Judicial Code of 1948 |
Included the U.S. District Court for Puerto Rico within the general definition of the U.S. district courts, thereby including it within the provisions for direct review by the Supreme Court applicable to all U.S. district courts under the Judicial Code of 1948 |
|
August 30, 1961 |
75 Stat. 417 |
Review of cases in the supreme court of Puerto Rico, as follows: |
|
Appeal from decisions holding invalid a federal statute or treaty |
||
|
Appeal from decisions holding valid a Puerto Rico statute alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution or federal law |
||
|
Review, by writ of certiorari, in cases in which the validity of a federal statute or treaty is drawn in question; cases in which a Puerto Rico statute is alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution or federal law; and cases in which a title, right, privilege or immunity is claimed under the Constitution, statutes, treaties or a commission of the United States |
||
|
June 27, 1988 |
Supreme Court Case Selections Act |
Limited review of all cases in the supreme court of Puerto Rico to writ of certiorari |
|
|
||
|
Utah Territory |
||
|
September 9, 1850 |
Utah Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Utah Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000, except that the matter in controversy requirement shall not apply to matters involving title to slaves and that appeal or writ of error will be allowed from a decision of the territorial supreme court or district courts, or any judge thereof, on a petition for habeas corpus |
|
June 23, 1874 |
Poland Act |
Added provision for writ of error to the supreme court of Utah Territory in criminal cases where the accused is sentenced to death or convicted of bigamy or polygamy |
|
|
||
|
Virgin Islands |
||
|
December 28, 2012 |
126 Stat. 1606 |
Review, by writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands, in the following cases: |
|
Cases in which the validity of a federal statute or treaty is drawn in question |
||
|
Cases in which a Virgin Islands statute is alleged to be repugnant to the Constitution or federal law |
||
|
Cases in which a title, right, privilege or immunity is claimed under the Constitution, statutes, treaties or a commission of the United States |
||
|
|
||
|
Washington Territory |
||
|
March 2, 1853 |
Washington Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Washington Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $2,000 and in cases where the Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty is brought into question |
|
|
||
|
Wisconsin Territory |
||
|
April 20, 1836 |
Wisconsin Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Wisconsin Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |
|
|
||
|
Wyoming Territory |
||
|
July 25, 1868 |
Wyoming Territory Organic Act |
Review, by appeal or writ of error, of cases in the supreme court of Wyoming Territory where the matter in controversy exceeds $1,000 |