You are here

State-Federal Judicial Observer, No. 2

Sandra Mazer Moss, G. Thomas Munsterman, William O. Bertelsman, William W Schwarzer, James G. Apple, David Williams
April 1, 1993

In this issue of the State-Federal Judicial Observer:

  • Disclosure Rules are Tested in State, Federal Courts: Federal Judge's Experiment with Proposed Disclosure Provisions Proves Successful, by William O. Bertelsman
  • Disclosure Rules are Tested in State, Federal Courts: Mandatory Disclosure, Arbitration Rules Dramatically Affect Arizona Litigation, by James G. Apple​
  • Three National State-Federal Bodies Meet; Discuss Legislative Proposals Affecting State and Federal Courts
  • Oklahoma Moves to Establish Three New State-Federal Judicial Councils
  • State-Federal Coordination Nationwide is Goal in Breast Implant Litigation
  • Judicial Education and Judicial Skills for State and Federal Judges--A Syllabus by William W Schwarzer​
  • Three New Bills May Affect Federal Court Criminal Caseloads​
  • State-Federal and Interstate Cooperation, Case Management Techniques Move Complex Litigation, Hasten Disposition of Asbestos, Other Cases, by Sandra Mazer Moss
  • Special Seminar for State Judges Helps Relieve Tensions from Bankruptcy Stays
  • State, Federal Courts Cooperate in Prospective Juror Selection and Jury Service Programs, by G. Thomas Munsterman & David Williams
  • Focus On: Historic Courthouse -- The courthouse in Greensburg, Green County, Kentucky, is the oldest standing courthouse west of the Allegheny Mountains. It was built in the years 1802-1804. (includes photograph)

The State-Federal Judicial Observer was published from 1993-1999 as an occasional newsletter. It was issued by the Center's Interjudicial Affairs Office to further the Center's statutory charge to further cooperation between the state and federal judiciaries. Issues covered a range of topics relating to judicial federalism and provide updates on state-federal judicial councils in the states that have them.