Correspondence

Displaying 461 - 470 of 530, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

Letters: Correspondence Concerning S. 2027

James D. Ellis, Veryl L. Riddle, Robert H. Duesenberg, Walter A. Suhre, Patrick W. Durick, John Francis Nangle

May 2, 1990

Correspondence to Congress members from judges and lawyers discussing the Biden Bill and the Judicial Conference's plan for reform. This Correspondence is summarized and attached to letter from Judge John F. Nangle to Judge Robert F. Peckham

Memo: to the Members of the Subcommittee on the Biden Bill

Karen K. Siegel

April 30, 1990

Karen K. Siegel informs members of the subcommittee on the Biden Bill that the Judicial Conference is about to approve the 14 Point Plan

Fax: S. 2027 Judicial Concerns

Diana E. Murphy

April 27, 1990

District of Minnesota Judge Diana E. Murphy shares her concerns about the Biden Bill

Fax: Civil Litigation Cost and Delay Reduction (Draft)

Karen K. Siegel

April 25, 1990

Karen K. Siegel faxes a draft of the Judicial Conference plan for civil litigation cost and delay reduction to Judge Diana E. Murphy

Letters: District of Maryland Judges and Magistrates Responses to Biden Bill

Clarence E. Goetz, J. Frederick Motz, Frederic N. Smalkin, Daniel E. Klein Jr., Deborah K. Chasanow, Catherine C. Blake

April 25, 1990

Letters composed by judges and magistrates in the District of Maryland and sent to Senator Joseph R. Biden and District of Maryland Senior Judge Frank A. Kaufman critiquing the Biden Bill

Memos: Biden Bill Executive Committee Proposal

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Stephen G. Breyer

April 25, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham forwards Correspondence from 1st Circuit Judge Stephen Breyer, who offers a critique of the 14-point Judicial Conference plan

American Bar Association Memo: S. 2027

Michael E. Tigar

April 24, 1990

An American Bar Association memo critiquing the Biden Bill

Fax: Critique of Executive Committee Proposal

Stephen G. Breyer

April 24, 1990

First Circuit Chief Judge Stephen Breyer transmits his comments on the Judicial Conference Executive Committee Proposal to Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham

Hawaii State Bar Association on the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, H.R. 3898

Samuel Pailthorpe King, Paul Alston

April 20, 1990

Samuel P. King transmits Paul Alston's (of The Hawaii State Bar Association) critique of the Biden Bill to Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham

Memos: S. 2027, the proposed Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Joseph R. Biden, William Hubbs Rehnquist

April 20, 1990

Contains Correspondence between Senator Biden and Chief Justice Rehnquist, as well as a memo from Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham to members of the Judicial Conference about voting on the 14-Point alternative to the Biden Bill.

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

Correspondence

Letters: Correspondence Concerning S. 2027

Memo: to the Members of the Subcommittee on the Biden Bill

Fax: S. 2027 Judicial Concerns

Fax: Civil Litigation Cost and Delay Reduction (Draft)

Letters: District of Maryland Judges and Magistrates Responses to Biden Bill

Memos: Biden Bill Executive Committee Proposal

American Bar Association Memo: S. 2027

Fax: Critique of Executive Committee Proposal

Hawaii State Bar Association on the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990, H.R. 3898

Memos: S. 2027, the proposed Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

Pages