You are here

CJRA Research Collection

Displaying 871 - 880 of 1048, sorted by most recent
Contains
Contains
Format: 2024
Greater than or equal to
May 1, 1990

This press release states the Judicial Conference's opposition to the Biden Bill and puts forth the Judicial Conference's 14-point alternative to the Biden Bill

May 1, 1990

This article is about Judicial Conference adoption, by ballot, of a 14-point program to address the problems of cost and delay in civil litigation through improved case management. (The Third Branch, Vol. 22, No. 5)

Karen K. Siegel
April 30, 1990

Karen K. Siegel informs members of the subcommittee on the Biden Bill that the Judicial Conference is about to approve the 14 Point Plan

Diana E. Murphy
April 27, 1990

District of Minnesota Judge Diana E. Murphy shares her concerns about the Biden Bill

Karen K. Siegel
April 25, 1990

Karen K. Siegel faxes a draft of the Judicial Conference plan for civil litigation cost and delay reduction to Judge Diana E. Murphy

Clarence E. Goetz, J. Frederick Motz, Frederic N. Smalkin, Daniel E. Klein Jr., Deborah K. Chasanow, Catherine C. Blake
April 25, 1990

Letters composed by judges and magistrates in the District of Maryland and sent to Senator Joseph R. Biden and District of Maryland Senior Judge Frank A. Kaufman critiquing the Biden Bill

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Stephen G. Breyer
April 25, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham forwards Correspondence from 1st Circuit Judge Stephen Breyer, who offers a critique of the 14-point Judicial Conference plan

Michael E. Tigar
April 24, 1990

An American Bar Association memo critiquing the Biden Bill

Stephen G. Breyer
April 24, 1990

First Circuit Chief Judge Stephen Breyer transmits his comments on the Judicial Conference Executive Committee Proposal to Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Joseph R. Biden, William Hubbs Rehnquist
April 20, 1990

L. Ralph Mecham informs all members of the Judicial Conference that their vote to oppose S. 2027 at last month's Judicial Conference session was unanimous.

Pages

Subscribe to CJRA Research Collection