CJRA Research Collection

Displaying 861 - 870 of 1048, sorted by most recent

form.antibot { display: none !important; } You must have JavaScript enabled to use this form.

S. 2648 (Report No. 101-416)

Joseph R. Biden

May 17, 1990

The S. 2648 draft of the Biden Bill

Fax: Critique of S. 2027 and H.R. 3898

Robert Manley Parker

May 15, 1990

Robert M. Parker offers a critique of Biden Bill, asserting it will drastically change the role of Federal Courts.

Fax: Suggestions for Editing/Revising Most Recent Version of Biden Bill.

Wayne D. Brazil

May 14, 1990

Magistrate Wayne D. Brazil offers commentary, edits, and annotations on the Biden Bill in a fax to Robert E. Feidler, Greg Scott, and Karen K. Siegel

Letters: S. 2027, the Biden Civil Justice Reform Act

Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Collins J. Seitz

May 14, 1990

Correspondence between Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham and 3rd Circuit Judge Collins J. Seitz discussing the Judicial Conference Executive Committee's plan for Judicial Reform

Article: Federal Court Watch: Biden, Judges Negotiate Civil Reform

Ann Pelham

May 14, 1990

Ann Pelham details the conflict between Biden Bill supporters and the Federal Judiciary. (Legal Times)

Memo: Administrative Office Director to Robert E. Feidler

Leonidas Ralph Mecham

May 8, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham describes relationships between Eastern District of Texas Judge Sam B. Hall and members of the Senate Judiciary Committee

Memo: Administrative Office Director to Karen K. Siegel and Robert E. Feidler

Leonidas Ralph Mecham

May 7, 1990

Administrative Office Director L. Ralph Mecham states that Northern District of Iowa Judge O'Brien has a close relationship with Biden and is offering to talk to Biden about the bill

Memo to the Director: Implementation of the 14-point Case Management Program

Karen K. Siegel

May 3, 1990

Karen K. Siegel writes to Administrative Office director L. Ralph Mecham to propose a plan to implement the 14 point alternative to the Biden Bill

Letters: Correspondence Concerning S. 2027

James D. Ellis, Veryl L. Riddle, Robert H. Duesenberg, Walter A. Suhre, Patrick W. Durick, John Francis Nangle

May 2, 1990

Correspondence to Congress members from judges and lawyers discussing the Biden Bill and the Judicial Conference's plan for reform. This Correspondence is summarized and attached to letter from Judge John F. Nangle to Judge Robert F. Peckham

Judicial Conference Approves Plan to Improve Civil Case Management

May 1, 1990

Announces the approval of the Judicial Conference's 14-point plan to improve case management practices

Federal Judicial Center

You are here

CJRA Research Collection

S. 2648 (Report No. 101-416)

Fax: Critique of S. 2027 and H.R. 3898

Fax: Suggestions for Editing/Revising Most Recent Version of Biden Bill.

Letters: S. 2027, the Biden Civil Justice Reform Act

Article: Federal Court Watch: Biden, Judges Negotiate Civil Reform

Memo: Administrative Office Director to Robert E. Feidler

Memo: Administrative Office Director to Karen K. Siegel and Robert E. Feidler

Memo to the Director: Implementation of the 14-point Case Management Program

Letters: Correspondence Concerning S. 2027

Judicial Conference Approves Plan to Improve Civil Case Management

Pages